Open

Category Archives: Immigration

Tamara News  /  Blog  /  Immigration
06 Oct 2026
UK immigration rule changes: Big Ben and the Houses of Parliament at golden hour

The UK Is Quietly Rewriting Its Visa Rules on October 8 — Five Changes Worth Knowing

Categories Immigration, Uk

A fresh round of UK immigration rule changes takes effect October 8, 2026, under a Home Office statement of changes published September 3 as HC 584. The amendments touch several visa routes at once — victims of modern slavery, visitors, EU Settlement Scheme holders, Hong Kong BN(O) applicants, and people on the domestic abuse route — without the kind of fee increases or salary threshold shake-ups that have made headlines in past statements of changes.

That lower profile doesn’t mean the changes are minor for the people they affect. Several provisions close long-standing gaps that immigration lawyers and advocacy groups have flagged for years.

What the UK immigration rule changes actually cover

The most significant shift affects victims of modern slavery on the Skilled Worker route: under the new rules, they can work for a different employer for the remainder of their visa validity, rather than being tied to the employer connected to their exploitation. Immigration advocates have long argued that employer-tied visas make it harder for trafficking and modern slavery victims to safely leave abusive situations, since doing so previously risked their immigration status along with their job.

On the Visitor route, several niche but meaningful changes take effect: training visits no longer require applicants to show the training is unavailable in their home country, and artists, entertainers, and musicians visiting the UK may now attend rehearsals as part of permitted activities, alongside qualifying entertainment staff supporting them. New provisions also accommodate Erasmus+ exchange participants under the visitor rules.

UK immigration rule changes: UK visa vignette sticker

EU Settlement Scheme and Hong Kong BN(O) changes

The EU Settlement Scheme sees adjustments to how proportionality is assessed for pre-settled status holders in certain circumstances, along with a modified three-month deadline for family members joining an EUSS holder for the first time, now linked to the date of their most recent lawful UK entry rather than a fixed point. On the Hong Kong BN(O) route, dependent children of BN(O) status holders will no longer need to separately complete their own five-year continuous residence period before qualifying for settlement alongside their parents — a change that should speed up settlement for BN(O) families with children who arrived at different times.

The domestic abuse route also expands: certain adult dependent children whose relationship with their sponsor broke down permanently due to abuse become newly eligible, addressing a gap where only the primary applicant’s circumstances were previously considered.

The smaller print worth knowing

A handful of technical changes round out the statement of changes. Fee waiver requests must now match the specific immigration route of the subsequent application for the waiver to carry forward, a procedural tightening the Home Office says is meant to prevent mismatched applications. Biometric enrollment deadlines are unaffected by application variations, meaning switching or amending an application does not reset the clock on required biometrics. The rules around suitability — the grounds on which an application can be refused for prior immigration law breaches, including bail failures and absconding — have also been clarified.

Transitional provisions mean applications submitted before October 8 will generally continue to be assessed under the prior rules for the specific provisions being changed, so applicants mid-process should check which version of the rules applies to their specific situation rather than assuming the new rules apply retroactively.

What happens for applicants after October 8

Immigration practitioners typically see a wave of questions in the weeks following any statement of changes, particularly from modern slavery victims and their advocates trying to understand the new employer-switching provision, and from Hong Kong BN(O) families working out whether their children now qualify for settlement sooner than previously expected. The Home Office has not signaled another statement of changes is imminent, meaning October 8’s rules are likely to stand without further amendment for at least the next few months.

Questions about the October 8 changes

When do the new UK immigration rules take effect?
The changes take effect October 8, 2026, under Home Office statement of changes HC 584, published September 3, 2026.

What changes for modern slavery victims?
Victims of modern slavery on the Skilled Worker route can now work for a different employer for the remainder of their visa, rather than being tied to the employer connected to their exploitation.

How does the Hong Kong BN(O) route change?
Dependent children of BN(O) status holders no longer need to separately complete their own five-year residence period before qualifying for settlement alongside their parents.

Do these changes affect visa fees or salary thresholds?
No. Unlike some past statements of changes, this round does not include fee increases or salary threshold adjustments.

Do the new rules apply to applications already submitted?
Generally no. Transitional provisions mean applications submitted before October 8 continue under the prior rules for most of the affected provisions.

More UK immigration coverage

For more on UK-related immigration policy, see our coverage of the Companies House identity verification deadlines for directors and the UK’s refugee resettlement scheme. For a US comparison, see our report on the Supreme Court’s immigration detention and bond hearings case.

Sources

06 Oct 2026
H-1B fee struck down: United States federal courthouse

A Federal Judge Just Tore Up the $100,000 H-1B Fee. Here’s Why It Won’t Be the Last Word

Categories Immigration, Work Permits

The H-1B fee struck down this week by a federal judge in California leaves the Trump administration’s $100,000 charge on new H-1B petitions blocked for now, but employers hoping the issue is settled should hold off celebrating — a proposed replacement fee of $103,265 remains under review at the Department of Homeland Security. US District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr., ruling in the Northern District of California on September 30, found the fee policy “arbitrary and capricious” and vacated it entirely, saying the administration failed to consider alternatives or the reliance interests of employers and workers affected by the sudden charge.

It is the second time a federal court has struck down the fee. A Massachusetts judge issued a similar nationwide ruling back in June 2026, finding comparable procedural defects in how the policy was imposed.

Why the H-1B fee struck down ruling matters

Judge Gilliam’s ruling centers on process rather than the underlying policy goal. The court found that imposing a $100,000 fee on H-1B petitions amounted to a “legislative rule” — a substantive change requiring the formal notice-and-comment process under the Administrative Procedure Act — rather than something the administration could simply impose by fiat. “There is no question here that Agency Defendants failed to consider any alternatives or the reliance interests of the regulated parties,” Gilliam wrote in his order, according to court filings reviewed by legal reporters.

The practical effect is that enforcement of the $100,000 fee is enjoined until the administration completes proper notice-and-comment rulemaking — a process that typically takes months and allows the public, employers, and advocacy groups to formally weigh in before a rule takes effect.

H-1B fee struck down: chart of H-1B visa applications by employer

What comes after the H-1B fee struck down decision

The ruling does not mean H-1B fees are off the table permanently. The Department of Homeland Security has a separate, proposed $103,265 fee already under review, and nothing in Gilliam’s decision prevents the administration from pursuing that or a similar charge through the proper rulemaking channel. Given that two separate federal courts have now struck down versions of this policy on nearly identical procedural grounds, any future attempt would likely need to clear the notice-and-comment bar explicitly to survive a legal challenge.

Immigration attorney Charles Kuck, among those who have tracked the litigation closely, has noted that the administration’s repeated attempts to impose steep H-1B fees without formal rulemaking suggest an urgency to raise the cost of the program quickly — an urgency that keeps running into the same procedural wall in court.

What this means for employers and visa holders

For now, employers filing new H-1B petitions are not subject to the $100,000 fee, restoring the prior cost structure while the legal situation remains unsettled. Companies that paid the fee before it was struck down, or that held back petitions due to the cost, will be watching closely for guidance from USCIS on how the agency plans to implement the court’s order in practice. The uncertainty itself has been costly for employers trying to plan hiring around a program whose cost structure has shifted multiple times within a single year.

What to watch next

The key date to watch is whether and when DHS formally opens notice-and-comment rulemaking on the proposed $103,265 fee, which would start a public comment period typically lasting 30 to 60 days before any new rule could take effect. Continued litigation is also likely regardless of that process, given the stakes for both the administration’s immigration agenda and the tech and consulting firms that rely heavily on the H-1B program.

What readers are asking

Is the $100,000 H-1B fee still in effect?
No. The fee is currently blocked following Judge Gilliam’s September 30, 2026 ruling, which found the policy unlawful.

Why did the judge strike down the fee?
The court found the fee amounted to a substantive “legislative rule” that required formal notice-and-comment rulemaking, which the administration did not conduct before imposing it.

Is this the first court to block the fee?
No. A Massachusetts federal judge issued a similar nationwide ruling against the fee in June 2026.

Could a new H-1B fee be introduced?
Yes. A proposed $103,265 fee announced by DHS in August 2026 remains under review and could move forward if the administration completes proper rulemaking.

What does “arbitrary and capricious” mean in this context?
It is a legal standard under the Administrative Procedure Act meaning the agency failed to reasonably justify its decision, including by not considering alternatives or the interests of affected parties.

Who is affected by this ruling?
Employers filing new H-1B petitions and the foreign workers those petitions cover are directly affected, as the ruling removes the $100,000 charge for now.

More on US visa policy

For more on US visa fee changes, see our coverage of the USCIS fee increases for asylum, parole, and TPS applicants and the new $750 expedited visa interview fee pilot. We also previously reported on the public charge rule change affecting green card applicants.

Sources

05 Oct 2026
Express Entry trades draw

Canada Just Invited 3,500 More Tradespeople to Apply for PR

Categories Canada, Immigration

Skilled tradespeople looking to settle in Canada got a fresh batch of good news on October 1. The latest Express Entry trades draw issued 3,500 invitations to apply for permanent residence. The cutoff score for this round sat at 476 points on Canada’s Comprehensive Ranking System, the tool IRCC uses to rank every Express Entry candidate. It is the second draw this year dedicated specifically to the Trades category. It brings the total invitations issued through that category in 2026 to 6,500.

Inside the latest Express Entry trades draw

Candidates needed a few things to qualify. First, they needed to meet the minimum work experience requirements specific to the Trades category. Second, they needed a Comprehensive Ranking System score of at least 476. Third, they needed an Express Entry profile created before the draw’s cutoff timestamp. That cutoff was set at 12:47:55 UTC on October 1, 2026.

There is a wrinkle for candidates who scored exactly 476 points. Because so many people can land on the same score, IRCC uses a tie-breaking rule based on profile creation date. For applicants at exactly the cutoff score, timing mattered more. Their profile needed to exist on or before May 28, 2026, at 16:55:23 UTC. Anyone who created a profile after that moment, even with a score of 476, missed this round.

How this compares to the year’s first trades draw

This was not the first Trades-specific draw of 2026. An earlier round on April 2 issued 3,000 invitations at a slightly higher cutoff of 477 points. Combined, the two draws have now issued 6,500 invitations through the Trades category so far this year. That volume signals Canada treats skilled trades as a genuine, ongoing pathway within Express Entry, not a one-off experiment.

A tradesperson at work featured in the Express Entry trades draw story

The Trades category is relatively new within Express Entry’s broader structure. That structure has traditionally leaned toward white-collar professions and higher-scoring candidates overall. Its continued use throughout 2026 suggests something deliberate. Canada is trying to close gaps in its skilled trades workforce through immigration, alongside its more familiar tech-and-finance-focused draws.

What this reveals about Canada’s selection priorities

Canada’s broader Express Entry strategy in 2026 has leaned toward candidates with existing Canadian connections. Provincial nominees and candidates with Canadian work experience have been prioritized across multiple draw categories this year, not just Trades. That shift makes sense from a policy standpoint. Candidates already living and working in Canada tend to integrate faster. They face fewer unknowns than applicants arriving from abroad for the first time.

For tradespeople specifically, that prioritization matters. Many skilled trades roles already follow this pattern, including electricians, welders and construction specialists. Canadian employers sponsor temporary workers in these roles, who later transition to permanent residence through exactly this kind of targeted draw. The draw’s design rewards people already embedded in that pipeline.

Why trades draws look different from other Express Entry rounds

Most Express Entry draws reward points for education, language test scores and years of skilled work experience in professional occupations. The Trades category works differently. It recognizes hands-on occupations that do not always score well under the general point system, even when Canada faces real shortages in exactly those fields. Electricians, plumbers, welders and heavy equipment operators are common examples.

That design choice reflects a practical problem Canada has flagged for years. A candidate with a strong trades background and years of hands-on experience can still score lower overall than a candidate with a university degree and less hands-on work history, simply because of how the general points system weighs education. Category-specific draws like this one exist to correct for that gap.

What’s next for Express Entry trades

Two Trades draws are now complete for 2026. Candidates in the category should watch for whether a third round lands before year-end. IRCC has not announced a fixed schedule for Trades-specific draws. Some other categories run on a more predictable cadence, but this one does not. Candidates sitting below this round’s 476 cutoff should keep building their profile. Work experience, language scores and Canadian job offers can all raise a candidate’s ranking ahead of the next invitation round.

Common questions, answered

How many invitations did the October 1 Express Entry trades draw issue?
IRCC issued 3,500 invitations to apply for permanent residence, with a Comprehensive Ranking System cutoff of 476 points.

Was this the only Trades-specific draw in 2026?
No. An earlier draw on April 2, 2026, issued 3,000 invitations at a 477-point cutoff. Together, the two draws have issued 6,500 invitations this year.

What is the tie-breaking rule for candidates at exactly 476 points?
Those candidates needed their Express Entry profile created on or before May 28, 2026, at 16:55:23 UTC. Only then were they included in this round.

What qualifies someone for the Trades category?
Candidates need to meet minimum work experience requirements specific to skilled trades occupations. They also need the required Comprehensive Ranking System score.

Does Canada prioritize candidates already living in the country?
Yes. Canada’s 2026 Express Entry strategy has favored provincial nominees and candidates with existing Canadian work experience across multiple draw categories.

When will the next Trades draw happen?
IRCC has not announced a fixed schedule for Trades-specific draws, so the timing of the next round remains unconfirmed.

Further sources

  • CIC News — Canada invites 3,500 tradespeople to apply for permanent residence. cicnews.com
  • Government of Canada — Express Entry rounds of invitations. canada.ca

For more on Canada’s immigration system, see our coverage of September’s Express Entry draw. We also covered Canada’s processing times update.

05 Oct 2026
Canada asylum Israel Palestine

Canada Reopens a Door for Israeli, Palestinian Claimants

Categories Canada, Immigration

Canada has quietly reopened a door for a specific group of failed asylum seekers. The new Canada asylum Israel Palestine measure waives a standard 12-month wait before someone can apply for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment. It covers nationals and former residents of Israel and Palestine. The change took effect September 29, 2026. For people facing deportation after a final negative decision, the waiver can mean the difference between removal and a fresh chance to make their case.

What the Canada asylum Israel Palestine waiver actually changes

Normally, a refused asylum claimant must wait a full year before applying for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment, known as a PRRA. That blackout period exists to prevent repeated, duplicative applications. Canada’s immigration department has now waived it for a specific group. The waiver applies to Israeli and Palestinian nationals and former residents who received a final negative decision between September 28, 2025, and September 29, 2026.

That window is deliberate. It covers people whose claims, prior PRRAs, or Federal Court cases were rejected during roughly the past year. That period overlaps with the most intense phase of the conflict in Gaza and the wider region. Eligible people can now reapply for PRRA status as protected persons. This applies even to those refused before.

Who qualifies, and who does not

Only nationals and former residents of Israel and Palestine qualify, and only if their final negative decision fell inside that specific window. Anyone who receives a negative decision after September 29, 2026, gets no benefit from the waiver. Those applicants face the standard rules again, including the usual 12-month blackout.

Application documents tied to the Canada asylum Israel Palestine measure

Applicants who do qualify must follow instructions on the federal government’s website to submit their PRRA application. A successful PRRA grants protection to anyone who faces persecution, torture, or a risk to their life if deported. The waiver does not guarantee approval. It restores the chance to apply, for people who would otherwise have waited out the full year first.

Why Canada made this change now

The move fits a pattern. Canada has adjusted its immigration rules repeatedly since late 2023 in response to the conflict in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Earlier steps included temporary measures and work permit extensions for people from the region. This latest step targets a narrower group: people already inside Canada’s asylum system who hit a procedural wall at a difficult moment.

Immigration lawyers describe blackout-period waivers like this one as rare. Officials usually reserve them for cases where conditions in a claimant’s home region shifted significantly since their case was decided. Israeli and Palestinian nationals had their claims assessed during an active, fast-moving conflict. That argument carries real weight with immigration lawyers watching the case.

How this fits Canada’s broader response

Canada has leaned on narrow, targeted measures throughout this conflict rather than broad, open-ended policy changes. Earlier steps extended work permits for Israeli and Palestinian nationals already in Canada, without opening new pathways for people outside the country. This PRRA waiver follows the same logic. It helps a specific, already-identified group clear a specific procedural obstacle, rather than creating a new general immigration stream.

That narrow approach has both supporters and critics. Supporters say it lets Canada respond quickly to a changing situation without overhauling its asylum system. Critics argue it leaves out people facing similar risks from other conflicts, who get no equivalent waiver.

Canadian immigration lawyers note the waiver does not expand who can claim asylum in the first place. It only reopens a narrow procedural door for people already deep in the system. For a claimant staring down a removal order, that distinction matters less than the practical result: one more chance to present evidence of risk, reviewed under rules that normally would have made them wait another several months just to file.

What comes next for applicants

Canada has not released figures on how many people the waiver is expected to help. No public estimate exists yet. Immigration advocates will likely cite this measure as a precedent when they push for similar flexibility for people facing deportation to other active conflict zones. Eligible applicants should move quickly. The waiver applies only to this specific decision window, and nothing suggests Ottawa will extend it indefinitely.

A few questions answered

What does the Canada asylum Israel Palestine waiver do?
It removes the standard 12-month wait before someone can apply for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment, specifically for Israeli and Palestinian nationals and former residents.

Who is eligible for the waiver?
Anyone from Israel or Palestine whose asylum claim, prior PRRA, or Federal Court case received a final negative decision between September 28, 2025, and September 29, 2026.

When did the measure take effect?
September 29, 2026.

Does the waiver apply to decisions made after September 29, 2026?
No. Anyone who gets a negative decision after that date faces the standard 12-month blackout period again.

What is a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment?
It is a review that can grant protection to someone facing deportation, if they can show a genuine risk of persecution, torture, or danger to their life back home.

Does a successful PRRA guarantee someone can stay in Canada?
Not automatically. But a successful assessment grants protected person status, which can prevent removal for applicants who prove a genuine risk.

Source material

  • CIC News — Canada gives second chance to asylum seekers from Israel and Palestine. cicnews.com
  • Government of Canada — Pre-removal risk assessment. canada.ca

For more on Canada’s immigration system, see our coverage of Canada’s processing times update. We also covered September’s Express Entry draw.

04 Oct 2026
US expedited visa interview fee - US passport page

US $750 Expedited Visa Interview Fee: Pilot Ends 31 December

Categories Immigration, Visa Updates

The US $750 expedited visa interview fee lets some visitor-visa applicants pay for a faster appointment, and the pilot is due to end on 31 December 2026. According to immigration law firm EIG Law, the fee applies to B1/B2 applicants and is paid on top of the standard $185 application fee.

What you need to know

How the pilot works

EIG says applicants first secure a standard appointment and can then upgrade to an expedited slot, if one is available, with an interview offered within 10 business days. The pilot is limited to selected US embassies and consulates. Sources differ slightly on timing: EIG gives a 1 July start, while Khaleej Times says the programme launched in June.

What the fee does not do

EIG stresses that the fee covers interview scheduling only, not the decision. Payment does not guarantee approval, slots are limited, and missing the appointment or failing to pay means losing the slot and the fee. EIG says the document does not address refunds. The State Department is to review results by year-end to decide whether to continue, change the price or expand the scheme.

Who might use it

Consider a hypothetical Brazilian founder who needs a B1/B2 visa for a trade show in a few weeks and faces a long wait at her local consulate. The pilot may help only if her post is on the list and a slot is open. It does not change eligibility, so a weak application stays weak. Always use official State Department channels to book, and be wary of third parties selling slots.

The visa landscape is shifting on several fronts. See our coverage of the October 2026 Visa Bulletin, the public charge rule change and the diversity visa update.

What happens next

If you need an appointment before the end of the year, check your consulate’s booking page for an expedited option now. After 31 December, availability depends on the State Department’s review.

Questions about the $750 fee

Who can use the expedited option?

B1/B2 visa applicants only, at selected posts, per EIG.

How much does it cost?

$750 on top of the $185 application fee.

How fast is the interview?

Within 10 business days, subject to slot availability.

Does it guarantee a visa?

No. It affects scheduling only.

When does the pilot end?

31 December 2026, with a review to follow.

See our immigration section for further US visa updates, including the Supreme Court detention case.

1 2 3 … 76