• Mon - Fri 9.00 - 19.00

Author Archives: Francisca Samuel

Author: Francisca Samuel

Francisca Samuel is an editor at Tamara News, where she covers immigration, travel, business and technology news for readers across Africa and the Gulf.

A Kosovo War Hero Once Welcomed at the White House Just Got 25 Years for War Crimes

The Hashim Thaci war crimes case reached its conclusion on 16 September 2026. Judges at the Kosovo Specialist Chambers in The Hague sentenced Kosovo’s former president to 25 years in prison. The court found him guilty of four counts tied to the 1998-99 war for independence from Serbia. Those counts include the murder of 96 political opponents and people the Kosovo Liberation Army viewed as collaborators with Serbian forces.

Thaci resigned as president in November 2020. He stepped down specifically to face these charges before the EU-backed tribunal. Kosovo lawmakers set up that tribunal to try KLA-era crimes that Kosovo’s own justice system had never fully addressed. Thaci pleaded not guilty throughout the trial. He maintained his innocence in his final statements to the court.

What the Hashim Thaci war crimes verdict actually found

Judges convicted Thaci of murder, torture, cruel treatment and arbitrary detention. Prosecutors argued he held command responsibility over KLA units. Those units ran detention sites where prisoners were beaten and denied food. In dozens of documented cases, KLA units executed prisoners outright. The defense argued Thaci was a political leader. It said he lacked direct operational control over the specific units involved in the killings.

Hashim Thaci war crimes — illustrative image

Both sides can appeal the ruling. Prosecutors had asked for a 45-year sentence. They are expected to challenge the 25-year term as too lenient. Thaci’s legal team is expected to challenge the conviction itself, not just the sentence length.

Why a war hero ended up in the dock

Thaci spent two decades as one of Kosovo’s most recognizable political figures. He served as prime minister and later as president. The White House hosted him during Kosovo-Serbia normalization talks under the first Trump administration. That history makes the sentence notable, since the tribunal’s ruling shows a war-era leader losing the benefit of the doubt his diplomatic career once carried. It shows the tribunal treating a sitting head of state’s wartime record the same way it treats any other defendant’s record.

The Kosovo Specialist Chambers sits in the Netherlands, not in Kosovo. That design choice was deliberate. It insulates the process from domestic political pressure. KLA veterans still hold significant public support inside Kosovo, which made a domestic trial politically difficult.

How Kosovo and Serbia are reacting

Kosovo’s government has largely stayed quiet on the verdict. The case splits public opinion. Some Kosovars see KLA fighters as liberators of their country. Others focus on the documented abuses the tribunal has now confirmed in court. Serbian officials have long accused the KLA of violence against Serb civilians during the war. They welcomed the conviction as overdue. The charges against Thaci, however, centered on Kosovar Albanian victims rather than Serb ones, a detail that complicates the reaction on both sides.

What comes next in the case

An appeal could take years to resolve. The Kosovo Specialist Chambers has no fixed appellate timeline. Thaci will serve his sentence outside Kosovo. The tribunal has no prison facility inside the country itself. Other KLA-era figures still face related proceedings before the same chambers. This verdict is unlikely to be the tribunal’s last major ruling on the war.

Global coverage of accountability efforts around the global state of democracy has tracked how war-crimes tribunals shape public trust in institutions. The Hague ruling arrives during a week when world leaders are already gathering for the UN General Assembly’s high-level week, where accountability and rule-of-law questions are likely to come up on the sidelines. The EU’s own posture toward the Balkans has also been shaped by its broader approach to sanctions and enforcement against Russia. Both cases form part of a wider European push to show its legal institutions carry real weight.

Frequently asked questions

Who is Hashim Thaci?

Thaci was a Kosovo Liberation Army political leader during the 1998-99 war. He later served as Kosovo’s prime minister and then president. He resigned in 2020 to face the tribunal’s charges.

What was Hashim Thaci convicted of?

He was convicted of murder, torture, cruel treatment and arbitrary detention. The charges relate to the deaths of 96 people during the KLA’s war against Serbian security forces.

Where is the Kosovo Specialist Chambers located?

The tribunal sits in The Hague, Netherlands. Kosovo law created it specifically to try KLA-era crimes.

Can Hashim Thaci appeal the sentence?

Yes. Both Thaci’s defense and the prosecution are expected to file appeals. Prosecutors had sought a 45-year sentence.

Will Thaci serve his sentence in Kosovo?

No. The Kosovo Specialist Chambers has no prison facility in Kosovo. Thaci will serve his term abroad, under an agreement with an EU member state.

Sources

  • Al Jazeera — Former Kosovo President Hashim Thaci sentenced to 25 years for war crimes. aljazeera.com
  • NPR — Kosovo’s ex-President Thaci convicted of war crimes, sentenced to 25 years in prison. npr.org
  • CBC News — Former Kosovo president Hashim Thaci sentenced to 25 years for 1990s war crimes. cbc.ca

The US Just Barred Flights Over a Fast-Growing Ebola Outbreak

US health authorities have barred travelers who recently visited the Democratic Republic of Congo from boarding commercial flights to the United States. The country’s Ebola outbreak is growing into one of the largest ever recorded.

The CDC Ebola travel restriction applies to anyone, including US citizens, who has been in the DRC within 21 days of departure. Affected travelers should stay outside the United States for at least 21 days after leaving the DRC before flying to a US destination.

How large the outbreak has become

As of September 14, 2026, the DRC had reported 7,258 confirmed Ebola cases and 3,510 related deaths. Health officials say the outbreak is spreading faster than previous Ebola epidemics. It now ranks as the second-largest on record.

The scale of the outbreak is what pushed US authorities toward a boarding restriction, rather than relying only on airport screening.

CDC Ebola travel restriction

Which areas carry the highest risk

The CDC has issued its highest-level travel notice for Ituri and Nord-Kivu provinces. It recommends against all travel there, except for humanitarian aid or emergency response work.

A lower but still elevated notice covers Haut-Uélé and Tshopo provinces. The CDC recommends avoiding nonessential travel there while the outbreak stays active.

What this means for the United States

The CDC stresses that no Ebola cases have been confirmed in the United States from this outbreak. It says the overall risk to the American public remains low.

The boarding restriction adds a preventive layer on top of existing screening. It aims to keep the virus from reaching the US at all, not to respond to domestic cases.

How this outbreak compares with past Ebola crises

The 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreak remains the largest on record. Comparisons to that event partly explain why health officials are treating this outbreak’s rapid spread with real concern.

Public health tools have improved since then, including faster genomic tracking and larger vaccine stockpiles. Those give authorities more options today, even as this outbreak’s case count climbs quickly.

What happens next with the CDC Ebola travel restriction

The restriction will likely stay in place as long as case counts keep climbing. It could tighten further if the outbreak spreads to more provinces or crosses into neighboring countries.

Airlines on routes that connect through the region are expected to coordinate with US authorities on compliance. Travelers with any recent DRC history should check current guidance before booking flights to the United States.

What travelers to the region should do now

Anyone with planned travel to or through the DRC should check the latest CDC guidance before booking. Province-level advisories can change quickly as the outbreak evolves.

Travelers who recently visited affected provinces and develop a fever or other Ebola symptoms should seek medical care right away. Tell providers about the travel history rather than waiting to see if symptoms pass.

Frequently asked questions

Who is affected by the CDC Ebola travel restriction?

Anyone, including US citizens and nationals, who has been in the Democratic Republic of Congo within 21 days of their planned departure is barred from boarding commercial flights to US destinations.

How big is the current Ebola outbreak?

As of September 14, 2026, the DRC had reported 7,258 confirmed cases and 3,510 related deaths, making it the second-largest Ebola outbreak on record.

Which provinces have the highest travel warnings?

The CDC recommends avoiding all travel to Ituri and Nord-Kivu provinces, and avoiding nonessential travel to Haut-Uélé and Tshopo provinces.

Has Ebola reached the United States?

No. The CDC says no cases have been confirmed in the US as a result of this outbreak, and the risk to the American public remains low.

How long do affected travelers have to wait before flying to the US?

Travelers who have been in the DRC should plan to remain outside the United States for at least 21 days after leaving the country before attempting to fly to a US destination.

Related coverage on Tamara News

Sources

A Judge Just Stopped Trump’s Birth Tourism Crackdown

A federal judge halted the Trump administration’s effort to end so-called birth tourism on September 14, 2026. The judge ruled the policy is almost certainly unconstitutional and cannot take effect while the case proceeds.

The birth tourism rule blocked decision covers Executive Order 14419, signed August 6, 2026. It would have let immigration officials deny visas or block entry for people believed to be visiting the US to give birth. It also allowed revoking travel authorization already granted.

What Executive Order 14419 tried to do

Under the order, the State Department and Department of Homeland Security would have gained new authority. Acting through USCIS, Customs and Border Protection and ICE, they could treat suspected birth tourism as grounds to deny or revoke a visa.

The administration framed the order as closing a loophole. It says the loophole has been used to secure automatic US citizenship for children born to visiting foreign nationals.

birth tourism rule blocked

Why the court blocked it

The federal judge issued a preliminary injunction after immigrant rights advocates challenged the rule. She found it likely conflicts with settled constitutional protections for children born on US soil.

A preliminary injunction pauses a rule while litigation continues. It doesn’t strike the rule down permanently, so the case will keep moving through the courts even though the rule can’t be enforced for now.

How this fits a pattern of blocked immigration rules

This isn’t the only Trump administration immigration rule paused by a federal court this month. A separate September 14 ruling also blocked a change to the Duration of Status system for international students and exchange visitors.

Together, the rulings suggest courts are moving quickly to pause major immigration policy changes issued through executive action, before they can affect travelers or families.

What legal experts are watching next

Immigration attorneys say the constitutional question here is well-settled. Existing Supreme Court precedent holds that children born on US soil are citizens at birth, regardless of their parents’ travel intentions. That’s part of why the judge moved so quickly.

That doesn’t guarantee the outcome on appeal. But it means the administration faces a high bar to get a higher court to let the rule take effect while the case continues.

What happens next in the birth tourism rule blocked case

The administration is expected to appeal the injunction. That process could take months and may eventually reach a higher court, given the constitutional questions involved.

Until the litigation resolves, current rules on visa issuance and entry for pregnant travelers stay unchanged. Families shouldn’t expect the blocked policy to affect travel plans in the near term.

How this affects visa applicants right now

Consular officers are processing visa applications under the standard rules that predate the blocked order, with no new birth-tourism screening questions in effect.

Applicants who were previously worried about extra scrutiny under the new policy can proceed with their applications as normal. Attorneys still advise keeping an eye on the case as it moves through appeal.

Frequently asked questions

What is Executive Order 14419?

It’s an August 6, 2026 executive order titled ‘Ending Birth Tourism’ that would let US immigration officials deny or revoke visas for foreign nationals believed to be traveling to the US to give birth.

Why was the birth tourism rule blocked?

A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction on September 14, 2026, finding the rule likely unconstitutional and pausing it while a legal challenge from immigrant rights advocates proceeds.

Is the birth tourism rule permanently struck down?

No. A preliminary injunction is a temporary pause while the underlying lawsuit continues; the case could still go through further appeals.

Does this affect current visa applicants?

For now, current rules on visa issuance for pregnant travelers remain unchanged, since the blocked rule cannot be enforced while the injunction is in effect.

Are other immigration rules facing similar court challenges?

Yes. A separate September 14 ruling also blocked a change to the Duration of Status system affecting international students, part of a broader pattern of court challenges to recent immigration rules.

Related coverage on Tamara News

Sources

Perplexity’s New AI Agent Wants to Run Your PC For You

Perplexity has brought its computer-operating AI agent to Windows. PC owners with high-end Nvidia graphics cards can now use a tool that carries out multi-step tasks, not just answers questions.

The Perplexity Windows AI agent rollout targets a specific slice of the Windows market. It requires an Nvidia GeForce RTX or RTX PRO GPU with at least 24GB of VRAM, hardware typically found in gaming and workstation PCs rather than everyday laptops.

What the agent can actually do

Rather than answering a query in a chat window, the agent operates applications on the user’s behalf. It follows instructions across multiple steps, the way a human would click through a task.

That sets it apart from Perplexity’s existing search product. It sits closer to the emerging category of ‘computer use’ AI agents that other labs have also raced to ship.

Perplexity Windows AI agent

Why the hardware requirement matters

Running an AI agent that can see and act on a screen in real time takes far more processing power than a text-based chatbot. That’s why Perplexity restricted the initial release to GPUs with substantial video memory.

That requirement limits early access to gamers, enthusiasts and professionals who already own high-end Nvidia hardware, rather than the broader Windows user base.

How this fits the wider AI agent race

Perplexity’s move follows a broader industry push toward agents that operate software directly. Several major AI labs have targeted this as the next step beyond conversational chatbots.

Apple separately opened a public beta of a rebuilt Siri, built with Google’s Gemini models, this same week. That shows how fast big tech companies are racing to ship agent-like AI features.

What happens next for the Perplexity Windows AI agent

Broader hardware support, including GPUs with less video memory, would signal that Perplexity wants to push past its current enthusiast audience.

Anyone considering the tool should weigh that it requires trusting an AI system to take real actions on their PC. That’s a step up in risk from a chatbot that only returns text.

Why Nvidia’s hardware sits at the center of this

The 24GB VRAM requirement shows how demanding these new agent tools are on graphics hardware. They often need to process screen content and run local AI models at the same time, rather than sending everything to a remote server.

That makes Nvidia’s high-end GPU lineup a gatekeeper for this new category of software. Earlier PC gaming features followed a similar pattern before becoming widely available.

Who should try it first

Owners of gaming or workstation PCs with the required Nvidia hardware are the natural early adopters. That’s especially true for anyone already comfortable granting an app broad background permissions.

Everyday laptop owners without a discrete high-end GPU will need to wait. A lighter version of the tool, if Perplexity builds one, could bring it to typical consumer hardware.

Frequently asked questions

What is Perplexity’s new Windows AI agent?

It’s an AI tool that can operate applications and carry out multi-step tasks on a Windows PC, rather than only answering questions in a chat window.

What hardware do I need to use it?

The agent currently requires an Nvidia GeForce RTX or RTX PRO graphics card with at least 24GB of VRAM, which limits it to higher-end gaming and workstation PCs.

How is this different from Perplexity’s search product?

Perplexity’s search tool answers questions using web content; this agent is designed to act on a user’s behalf inside applications, following multi-step instructions.

Are other companies building similar AI agents?

Yes. Several major AI labs and tech companies, including Apple with its rebuilt Siri, are racing to ship agents that can operate software directly rather than just chat.

Is there a risk to letting an AI agent control my PC?

Any tool that can take real actions on your computer carries more risk than a text-only chatbot, so users should understand what permissions they are granting before enabling it.

Related coverage on Tamara News

Sources

Cloudflare Just Cut Off a Whole Class of AI Bots

Cloudflare began blocking a category of AI web crawlers by default on September 15, 2026. The change could reshape how AI companies gather training and search data from millions of websites.

The Cloudflare AI crawler block targets what Cloudflare calls ‘mixed-use’ crawlers. These are bots that scrape content for both AI model training and live AI-powered search results. The new default applies to ad-supported pages across Cloudflare’s network.

What counts as a mixed-use crawler

Cloudflare draws a line between crawlers that index pages for traditional search, and those that feed scraped content into AI systems that answer questions directly, often without sending a visitor to the original site.

Mixed-use crawlers fall into the second group. They pull content for both purposes. Cloudflare argues that undercuts the traffic and ad revenue ad-supported publishers depend on.

Cloudflare AI crawler block

Why publishers have been pushing for this

News publishers have complained for more than a year that AI search summaries answer questions using scraped articles. Readers get the answer without clicking through, so publishers lose the traffic.

Cloudflare sits in front of a large share of the web’s traffic. That gives its default settings outsized influence over what AI companies can access, without individual publishers configuring blocking rules themselves.

How AI companies are likely to respond

Site owners can still opt back in and allow mixed-use crawlers. So the change works as a new default, not an outright ban.

AI companies that need continuously refreshed web content, for training and real-time answers alike, may need direct licensing deals with publishers instead of relying on open crawling.

What happens next for the Cloudflare AI crawler block

Cloudflare has rolled out similar publisher-friendly tools gradually before, watching adoption before widening scope. Other categories of crawlers could face new defaults in the months ahead.

Publishers and AI companies alike will watch whether other infrastructure providers follow Cloudflare’s lead. That would make opting out of AI scraping the norm, rather than something publishers configure themselves.

The bigger fight over who owns web content

This change is one piece of a wider dispute between AI companies and publishers. Their content trains and feeds AI models, and that fight has already produced lawsuits and licensing deals across the news industry.

Cloudflare positioning itself as a gatekeeper gives it new leverage in that negotiation. It can shift the default terms of access without any single publisher or AI company negotiating directly.

What site owners should check now

Publishers using Cloudflare should confirm their current crawler settings. Don’t assume the new default matches what you want. Sites that previously allowed all bots may now block traffic they intended to keep.

Sites that rely on AI-driven referral traffic for any part of their audience should weigh that tradeoff before deciding whether to opt back in.

Frequently asked questions

What did Cloudflare change on September 15, 2026?

Cloudflare began blocking ‘mixed-use’ AI crawlers by default on ad-supported pages across its network, a change aimed at AI bots that scrape content for both training and live search answers.

What is a mixed-use AI crawler?

It’s a bot that scrapes website content for two purposes at once: training AI models and powering AI search tools that answer user questions directly, often without driving traffic back to the source site.

Can website owners still allow these crawlers?

Yes. The new setting is a default, not a permanent block, so site owners can opt back in and allow mixed-use crawlers if they choose to.

Why does this matter for publishers?

Publishers have argued that AI search answers built from their content reduce the traffic and ad revenue their sites depend on, since readers get answers without clicking through.

Will other companies follow Cloudflare’s approach?

It’s too early to say, but Cloudflare’s scale means its default settings already influence a large share of AI companies’ ability to crawl the open web without individual publisher agreements.

Related coverage on Tamara News

Sources