AI Data Centre IPOs Stall as Valuation Fears Grow

AI data centre companies are struggling to go public: a Nvidia-backed data centre firm has scrapped its IPO as valuation concerns deepen, the BBC reported on 9 October, following a run of delays that Bisnow detailed in September. We could not access the full BBC article, so the specifics below come from Bisnow’s earlier reporting.

In this report

The September delays

Bisnow reported on 22 September that SoftBank-backed SB Energy delayed an offering after investors reportedly balked at a valuation above $50 billion. The company says it has 8.8 GW contracted or under construction, nearly all tied to an OpenAI-leased campus on federal land, and has not yet brought a data centre online. Nuclear and power firm Holtec postponed a Nasdaq IPO expected at up to $10 billion, citing “uncertainty of data center development”. Aggreko was reported to be slowing its process.

Why investors are cautious

Bisnow lists investor scepticism over valuations, local and state opposition to data centres, scarce large power supplies and labour shortages, and a sell-off in AI stocks over fears of slowing demand. The same pressure shows in Finland’s decision to halt Google data-centre construction.

Who is still lining up

Close to a dozen other firms reportedly still aim to list in the coming months, and Anthropic is reportedly on course for a late-2026 listing, per Bisnow. CyrusOne, Vantage, Switch and Nscale are reportedly exploring IPOs. Many in the industry say they are not worried about a demand slowdown. Note that these are industry-sourced claims from parties with an interest in the sector.

What happens next

Watch OpenAI’s own numbers, which are now in question after a reported revenue revision, and rate expectations given the three-year-high mortgage rates. If you run a business and are weighing where to base it, see our company formation guide.

Data centre IPOs: questions answered

Which data centre IPOs have been delayed?

Per Bisnow, SB Energy, Holtec and reportedly Aggreko, with the BBC reporting a Nvidia-backed firm scrapped its IPO on 9 October.

Why are investors hesitant?

Valuation scepticism, local opposition, power and labour constraints and an AI stock sell-off, according to Bisnow.

Is Anthropic still planning to list?

Bisnow reports it is still on target for late 2026.

Does this mean AI demand is falling?

Not necessarily; many industry figures say they see no demand slowdown, though that is a view from interested parties.

Related reading: US stocks slide as yields climb.

OpenAI Revenue Reportedly $20 Billion Below Projection

OpenAI’s annualised revenue is reportedly “approaching $50 billion”, about $20 billion below the roughly $70 billion figure reported two weeks earlier, according to TechCrunch, which cites the Financial Times. OpenAI had not confirmed the lower number on the record, TechCrunch said.

Inside this story

Where the two numbers came from

Axios reported on 29 September 2026 that OpenAI’s annualised revenue was approaching $70 billion. Per the Financial Times, as relayed by TechCrunch, that figure came from information shared with OpenAI investors and was an attempt to compare OpenAI directly with Anthropic. The Financial Times now reports OpenAI has told investors the figure is closer to $50 billion.

The Anthropic comparison

CNBC reported on 17 August 2026 that Anthropic’s annualised revenue reached $65 billion in July. TechCrunch notes the two companies calculate the metric differently: Anthropic counts sales made through its cloud partners, while OpenAI does not. That accounting difference means the headline numbers are not like-for-like. Anthropic is a competitor of OpenAI, so each side’s figures should be read with that interest in mind.

Funding and IPO backdrop

TechCrunch lists OpenAI’s $122 billion funding round in March 2026, and notes CNBC reported on 19 August that the company’s IPO has been pushed to early 2027. Leaked 2025 financials reported by Inc. showed about $13 billion in revenue, with spending significantly higher. Investor appetite for AI-linked listings is a live question, as our coverage of the data-centre backlash and the stalled listings in our data-centre IPO report shows.

What to watch

The key tests are whether OpenAI confirms its figure, whether investors accept a like-for-like methodology across AI labs, and how the revision affects the IPO timetable. For more on the company’s recent turmoil see our report on the safety researcher resignation.

OpenAI revenue: questions answered

What is OpenAI’s reported annualised revenue now?

Approaching $50 billion, according to the Financial Times as relayed by TechCrunch.

What was the earlier figure?

Axios reported on 29 September that it was approaching $70 billion.

Has OpenAI confirmed the new number?

TechCrunch’s article carries no on-the-record confirmation.

Why are OpenAI and Anthropic hard to compare?

Anthropic counts sales through its cloud partners; OpenAI does not, per TechCrunch.

Related reading: Google bug bounty AI freeze and OpenAI rogue agents alerts.

Shionogi Pays $2 Billion for a Drug Only a Few Thousand Patients Use

Shionogi agreed on October 5, 2026, to pay $2 billion in cash for IntraBio. IntraBio is a small, privately held biotech based in Austin, Texas. The Shionogi IntraBio rare disease deal hands the Japanese drugmaker a medicine that treats two separate ultra-rare, often fatal genetic disorders. It also brings a pipeline aimed at a handful of other conditions most people have never heard of.

What the Shionogi IntraBio Rare Disease Deal Actually Buys

Shionogi IntraBio rare disease deal

IntraBio’s lead product, Aqneursa, won U.S. approval in 2024 for Niemann-Pick disease type C. That is a rare neurodegenerative disorder. Late last month, the FDA cleared the same drug for a second use: ataxia-telangiectasia. That is a genetic condition that damages the nervous system and immune system from early childhood. Fierce Pharma’s reporting on the deal notes that Aqneursa is now the first approved treatment for ataxia-telangiectasia anywhere in the world.

IntraBio reported $68 million in sales for 2025. That is a modest figure next to the $2 billion price tag Shionogi just agreed to pay. Shionogi is clearly paying for more than current revenue. It gets IntraBio’s rare-disease development team. It also gets a pipeline that includes a Phase 3 program for CACNA1A-related disorders. Shionogi estimates that group of neurological conditions affects about 30,000 people in the United States, and none currently have an approved treatment.

Why a Tiny Patient Population Still Commands a Big Price

Rare-disease drugs often carry prices most consumers would find startling. So few patients exist to share the cost of development that each one effectively pays more. Regulators also tend to move faster on these approvals than on mainstream drugs. Insurers rarely push back hard on reimbursement once a treatment becomes the only option on the market. That combination makes ultra-rare disease drugs attractive to acquirers, even when the current sales base looks small.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration grants orphan drug status to treatments for conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 Americans. That status comes with tax credits and extended market exclusivity. Aqneursa qualifies for both of its approved uses. Those protections make the economics of ultra-rare disease drugs more predictable for a buyer like Shionogi. They also help explain why competition for approved orphan drugs has intensified across the pharmaceutical industry this year.

A Rare Disease Deal Fits a Wider Pattern in Pharma

Shionogi built much of its business on antibiotics and antiviral drugs. It has spent the past two years trying to diversify away from that base. In April, it paid $2.5 billion for Tanabe Pharma’s Radicava, a treatment for ALS. Shionogi projects Radicava could reach $700 million in annual sales. BioPharma Dive’s coverage of the IntraBio deal notes that Shionogi plans to apply IntraBio’s regulatory and commercial expertise across its wider rare-disease pipeline. That pipeline includes programs targeting Pompe disease and Fragile X syndrome.

Shionogi is not alone in chasing rare-disease assets this month. Novartis struck its own rare-disease and oncology licensing agreement with China’s Abogen Biosciences just days earlier. That deal is part of a broader wave of pharma dealmaking. It has continued even as bank earnings season dominates the wider market’s attention this week. Large drugmakers increasingly prefer buying proven, approved rare-disease treatments over gambling on early-stage pipelines. A drug already on the market simply carries far less regulatory risk.

Shionogi’s chief executive, Isao Teshirogi, framed the purchase as a natural extension of the company’s history. He said the deal reflects Shionogi’s “solid commitment to building a leading global rare disease business.” He pointed to the company’s track record with infectious diseases as the model for its approach to rare conditions now. Nathan McCutcheon, head of Shionogi’s U.S. subsidiary, said the acquisition would help “accelerate the development of new treatment options.” He noted that patients with these conditions often wait years for any approved therapy at all.

What Still Has to Happen Before the Deal Closes

IntraBio will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Shionogi’s New Jersey-based U.S. division once the transaction completes. Shionogi said it will review how the acquisition affects its financial outlook for the fiscal year ending next March. That language signals Shionogi has not yet folded IntraBio’s numbers into its own guidance. Neither company has disclosed a target closing date. Neither has detailed the payment structure beyond describing it as an all-cash transaction. The announcement follows a busy week for large corporate transactions, including the completed Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger in media.

The deal still needs standard antitrust clearance. IntraBio’s narrow patient base makes a competition challenge unlikely, though. Investors will be watching Shionogi’s next earnings update closely. They want guidance on how quickly Aqneursa’s second approved use can add meaningfully to sales. They will also want to know whether the CACNA1A pipeline advances on schedule toward a possible future filing.

Shionogi-IntraBio Deal: Fast Facts

How much is Shionogi paying for IntraBio?

$2 billion in cash, according to both companies’ statements on October 5, 2026.

What does IntraBio’s drug Aqneursa treat?

It treats Niemann-Pick disease type C, approved in 2024, and ataxia-telangiectasia, approved in September 2026 as its second use.

How much revenue does Aqneursa generate?

IntraBio reported $68 million in sales for 2025, well below the deal’s $2 billion price.

Why is Shionogi buying rare-disease drugmakers?

Shionogi is trying to diversify beyond its traditional infectious-disease business. It bought the ALS drug Radicava for $2.5 billion in April. It is now adding IntraBio’s rare-disease pipeline and expertise on top of that.

Has the Shionogi-IntraBio deal closed?

No. Shionogi had not disclosed a closing date as of the announcement. The acquisition still requires standard regulatory clearance.

What other conditions could IntraBio’s pipeline eventually treat?

IntraBio is running Phase 3 trials for CACNA1A-related disorders. That is a group of rare neurological conditions estimated to affect about 30,000 people in the United States, with no currently approved treatment.

Levi’s Profit Jumps 39%, Thanks to a Tariff Refund Nobody Expected

Levi Strauss reported third-quarter results on October 7, 2026. The numbers surprised Wall Street. Net income jumped 39% to $168.6 million. A Levi Strauss tariff refund added 16 cents to earnings per share, the company said. That refund turned what could have been a flat quarter into one of Levi’s strongest in years. The denim maker also raised its full-year profit forecast. Management is betting that steady demand and lower duties will carry the business through the earnings season and into the holidays.

How the Levi Strauss Tariff Refund Changed the Quarter

Levi Strauss tariff refund

Levi Strauss booked net revenue of $1.61 billion for the quarter ended August 30, 2026. That is up 4% from a year earlier, and up 5% on an organic basis. The figures come from the company’s own filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations reached 43 cents, up from 31 cents a year ago. Adjusted EPS hit 48 cents, also well above last year’s 34 cents.

Most of that gain traces back to trade policy, not just stronger sales. Levi’s received refunds tied to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, known as IEEPA. Those refunds added 16 cents to EPS on their own. The company plowed roughly 5 cents of that back into marketing and promotions. That left a net benefit of about 11 cents. Even stripping out the refund entirely, earnings still grew from a year earlier.

Gross margin expanded 450 basis points to 66.2%. Operating margin rose to 13.8% from 10.8%. Nine-month revenue now stands at $4.91 billion, up 9% from the same period in 2025. Those are the kind of margin gains retail investors tend to reward quickly, and Levi’s stock moved on the news.

Why the Refund Lands at a Useful Moment for Apparel Sellers

Tariffs have squeezed clothing companies all year. Levi’s finance chief warned back in April that duties could cost the company roughly $100 million in fiscal 2026. The company spent months offsetting that hit. It raised some prices. It renegotiated with suppliers. It shifted sourcing away from China. A partial refund now reverses some of that earlier pain, and the timing helps. It arrives just as households start back-to-school and holiday shopping, as the company first flagged the tariff pressure to investors back in April.

The timing matters beyond one company’s balance sheet, too. Apparel makers import most of their stock from Asia. Any shift in duty policy ripples through pricing on store shelves worldwide. A refund for Levi’s signals that at least some of this year’s tariff costs were not permanent. Other importers will watch that signal closely as they plan next year’s budgets and pricing strategies.

The Soft Spot Beneath the Levi Strauss Tariff Refund Headline

Not every number in Thursday’s report was rosy. Direct-to-consumer sales, which include company-run stores and e-commerce, rose only 2%. Comparable sales grew just 0.4%. That is a sharp slowdown from the high-single-digit comparable growth Levi’s posted in the same quarter last year. Revenue in the Americas region, Levi’s largest market, rose only 4% overall. Sales inside the United States actually fell 1%.

Europe and Asia carried more of the load this quarter. European revenue rose 4% on a reported basis and 5% organically. Asia grew 5% reported and 10% organically. Wholesale sales, where Levi’s sells through other retailers, rose 6% company-wide. That outpaced growth in Levi’s own stores. The split raises a real question for analysts to press management on. Is the U.S. consumer actually slowing down? Or is Levi’s direct retail business simply losing ground to wholesale partners and resale competitors?

Analysts had mixed reactions to the print. Some noted that the tariff refund and currency swings flattered the headline numbers. Others pointed out that the gross margin gain came from real pricing power, not accounting noise. Levi’s stock swung in early trading as investors weighed both views. Shares ended the session higher, which suggests the market leaned toward the more optimistic read.

The Guidance Levi’s Is Banking On Through the Holidays

Levi Strauss raised its adjusted full-year earnings guidance to a range of $1.54 to $1.56 per share. That is up from $1.46 to $1.52 previously. The company now expects adjusted operating margin of about 12.1%, slightly above its earlier 12% target. Reported revenue growth guidance held at roughly 7%. Organic growth guidance edged up to about 6%.

The company also announced a $100 million accelerated share repurchase program. It kept its quarterly dividend at 16 cents a share. Management said it expects direct-to-consumer comparable sales to return to mid-single-digit growth in the fourth quarter. That recovery still needs to show up in the numbers to justify how investors reacted to Thursday’s report. Levi’s also confirmed it now reports its former Dockers brand as a discontinued operation, following its planned exit from that business earlier this year. The result sits alongside a string of other Q3 2026 corporate reports this week that have largely beaten lowered expectations.

Levi Strauss Earnings: Questions Readers Are Asking

What drove Levi Strauss’s Q3 2026 profit jump?

A mix of higher gross margin, strong international demand, and a one-time tariff refund worth 16 cents per share. Net income rose 39% to $168.6 million.

How much did tariffs cost Levi’s before the refund?

The company had expected roughly $100 million in tariff-related costs for fiscal 2026 when it gave guidance back in April. The October refund offset part of that earlier hit.

Did Levi Strauss raise its full-year guidance?

Yes. It raised adjusted EPS guidance to $1.54 to $1.56 and lifted its adjusted operating margin target to about 12.1%.

Is demand for Levi’s weakening in the United States?

U.S. revenue fell 1% in the quarter. Comparable direct-to-consumer sales grew just 0.4%, well below last year’s pace. Growth came mostly from Europe and Asia instead.

What is Levi Strauss doing with its extra cash?

The company launched a $100 million accelerated share buyback. It also kept its quarterly dividend at 16 cents per share.

When will Levi Strauss report its next results?

The company’s fiscal fourth quarter ends in late November. Results are typically released in January.

Gulf Drivers Pay 60% More at the Pump, Relief Isn’t Near

The Gulf oil price shock is not easing, even as officials insist the Strait of Hormuz is functioning again. Pump prices in the UAE rose for a third straight month in October, war-risk insurance premiums keep climbing, and the IMF is warning that relief may not come quickly. The economics of the Gulf war have become a story of their own, separate from who controls the water.

Inside the Gulf Oil Price Shock at the Pump

Gulf oil price shock

The UAE’s Fuel Price Committee raised retail prices for October, the third consecutive monthly increase. Super 98 petrol rose to Dh4.40 a litre from Dh3.80. Diesel climbed to Dh4.80 a litre from Dh4.30, according to Gulf News. Retail fuel prices in the UAE have now risen more than 60 per cent since the war began in late February.

A typical 50 to 60 litre fill-up now costs up to Dh125 more than before the spike. The G7 released 100 million barrels from emergency stockpiles earlier in the year, a move that briefly cut prices by roughly $5 a barrel. October’s pump prices still reflect the spike that move only partly offset.

Why the Gulf Oil Price Shock Is Proving Sticky

Crude is technically moving again. Ship-tracker Kpler put the seven-day average for Gulf crude exports at 18.5 million barrels per day on October 1, against a pre-war average near 18 million bpd, per Khaleej Times. Combined crude, products and other liquids reached 22.4 million bpd in the week to September 30.

Volume recovering does not mean costs are back to normal. Insurers are charging higher war-risk premiums for Gulf transit, and that raises freight rates and import costs further down the chain. Shipping intelligence firm Marisks tracked at least seven tanker incidents around the strait in recent weeks, including an October 1 fire on the crude carrier Kazimah III. The UK’s maritime trade agency has logged at least one attack a day in the strait or the Gulf of Aden since October 2, which keeps insurers cautious even as tonnage flows.

The IMF’s Warning on Oil Prices Clashes With Washington’s Optimism

US officials have struck an upbeat tone. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this week that oil flows are nearly back to prewar levels and that the strait is open. IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva offered a more cautious note. Speaking in Singapore ahead of the fund’s annual meetings, she said: “Even if the war in the Gulf were to end soon, the problem of high energy prices would likely persist for some time,” The National reported. She described the energy shock as large but contained.

Not every voice sounds pessimistic. Vitol’s Tom Baker said Gulf refining capacity is recovering quickly, helped by roughly 2 million bpd of Russian refining capacity that remains offline and reduced Chinese output, both of which keep demand for Gulf barrels firm regardless of the politics.

What Could Ease the Gulf Oil Price Shock Next

Three things will decide whether the Gulf oil price shock eases or deepens. First, whether tanker attacks slow down enough for insurers to cut war-risk premiums. Second, whether the diplomatic track Rubio and Vance described produces an actual enrichment deal, not just another truce. Third, whether Asian and European buyers keep paying a premium for Gulf cargoes instead of switching suppliers.

None of those answers will arrive this week. The squeeze adds to a week already crowded with economic news, from bank earnings season to mortgage rates sitting at a three-year high and a September jobs report that missed estimates, all feeding into how central banks read the inflation outlook.

For now, households and shippers absorbing the costs are the clearest sign that a dispute over a waterway has become an ordinary economic burden.

Gulf Oil Price Shock: Questions Worth Asking

Why are fuel prices still rising if oil exports have recovered?
Export volumes and retail prices move separately. Insurance costs, refining disruptions elsewhere and cautious shipping all keep landed costs higher even when tanker traffic resumes.

How much have UAE pump prices risen since the war began?
More than 60 per cent since late February 2026, according to Gulf News, with the Fuel Price Committee raising prices for a third straight month in October.

Does the IMF expect prices to fall soon?
No. Kristalina Georgieva said high energy prices could persist even if the war ends soon, calling the shock large but contained rather than temporary.

Are oil exports really back to pre-war levels?
Kpler’s tracking puts exports close to or slightly above pre-war averages, though Iran’s IRGC disputes this and tanker attacks keep threatening the recovery.

Who is most exposed to rising war-risk insurance costs?
Shippers and airlines operating in or near the Gulf, which pass higher premiums on to freight rates, ticket prices and ultimately consumer goods.

What would actually bring prices down?
A durable drop in tanker attacks, a verified nuclear deal that removes sanctions risk, or new pipeline supply that bypasses the strait entirely.