Tag Archives: geopolitics

A Trump Iran war end may finally be in sight. The president said so on 17 September 2026. He told reporters he hopes fighting between the United States and Iran is “toward” its conclusion. Trump said Iran “wants to make a deal.” He added that he had heard from Tehran “directly.” Iranian officials, however, have not confirmed that direct negotiations have actually resumed.

The comments came as the conflict enters its seventh month. There is no clear resolution on the ground yet. A day earlier, a senior Iranian official had publicly rejected talks. That official said Iran would not negotiate unless its conditions were met first. The gap between Trump’s public optimism and Tehran’s official position remains wide.

What Trump actually said about the Iran war ending

Speaking to reporters, Trump said he was hopeful an end to the war was near. He gave no specific timeline. He offered no detail on what a deal might actually contain. The White House has not released a formal framework for any agreement. Separately, reports indicate Trump is expected to meet leaders or foreign ministers from six Gulf Cooperation Council states. Those states are Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait and Oman. The meeting is expected on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly next week.

Why Gulf states are central to any deal

Qatar, Pakistan and Oman have served as the main intermediaries throughout the conflict. Washington and Tehran have no direct diplomatic channel of their own. The planned meeting with Gulf leaders is expected to focus on a postwar strategy for the region. It is not expected to settle immediate ceasefire terms. That framing suggests Washington is already planning past an active conflict, even without a confirmed truce in hand.

Gulf states have their own stake in ending the fighting. The conflict has pushed oil prices toward $100 a barrel. It has also unsettled shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Several Gulf economies depend heavily on that route for their exports.

The gap between optimism and the facts on the ground

Trump’s comments followed weeks of continued strikes on both sides. The U.S. has targeted Iranian oil tankers and related infrastructure. Iran has fired missiles at U.S. positions in the region, including a base in Jordan. Iranian officials have consistently said they will not negotiate under what they call military pressure. No Iranian government spokesperson had, as of publication, confirmed Trump’s claim of direct contact between the two sides.

What to watch next

The UN General Assembly’s high-level week gives both sides a rare venue. Informal contact through intermediaries becomes easier there, even without a formal bilateral meeting on the calendar. Trump’s optimism will likely become clearer once Gulf leaders report back from their New York meetings. Markets and shipping insurers are watching closely. Any credible de-escalation signal tends to move oil prices within hours of being announced.

Coverage of the region has also tracked related developments, including a recent Pentagon watchdog report on Iran operations and a UN sanctions panel vote on Iran. Both feed into the broader picture world leaders will discuss during the UN General Assembly’s high-level week. That timing means Iran policy will likely dominate side conversations in New York even without a formal session dedicated to it.

Frequently asked questions

Has Iran confirmed direct talks with the US?

No. Trump says he has heard from Iran directly, but no Iranian official has confirmed that direct negotiations have resumed.

Who is mediating between the US and Iran?

Qatar, Pakistan and Oman have served as the main intermediaries throughout the conflict, since Washington and Tehran have no direct diplomatic channel.

When is Trump meeting Gulf leaders?

Reports indicate the meeting with Gulf Cooperation Council leaders or foreign ministers is expected next week, on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.

How long has the Iran war been going on?

As of Trump’s September 17 comments, the conflict was in its seventh month with no confirmed ceasefire in place.

Why do Gulf states want the war to end?

The conflict has pushed oil prices toward $100 a barrel and disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a route several Gulf economies depend on.

Sources

• Arab News — Trump says “hopefully we are toward end” of Iran war. arabnews.com
• Al Jazeera — Trump claims direct talks with Iran: Is diplomacy picking up again? aljazeera.com

The Hashim Thaci war crimes case reached its conclusion on 16 September 2026. Judges at the Kosovo Specialist Chambers in The Hague sentenced Kosovo’s former president to 25 years in prison. The court found him guilty of four counts tied to the 1998-99 war for independence from Serbia. Those counts include the murder of 96 political opponents and people the Kosovo Liberation Army viewed as collaborators with Serbian forces.

Thaci resigned as president in November 2020. He stepped down specifically to face these charges before the EU-backed tribunal. Kosovo lawmakers set up that tribunal to try KLA-era crimes that Kosovo’s own justice system had never fully addressed. Thaci pleaded not guilty throughout the trial. He maintained his innocence in his final statements to the court.

What the Hashim Thaci war crimes verdict actually found

Judges convicted Thaci of murder, torture, cruel treatment and arbitrary detention. Prosecutors argued he held command responsibility over KLA units. Those units ran detention sites where prisoners were beaten and denied food. In dozens of documented cases, KLA units executed prisoners outright. The defense argued Thaci was a political leader. It said he lacked direct operational control over the specific units involved in the killings.

Both sides can appeal the ruling. Prosecutors had asked for a 45-year sentence. They are expected to challenge the 25-year term as too lenient. Thaci’s legal team is expected to challenge the conviction itself, not just the sentence length.

Why a war hero ended up in the dock

Thaci spent two decades as one of Kosovo’s most recognizable political figures. He served as prime minister and later as president. The White House hosted him during Kosovo-Serbia normalization talks under the first Trump administration. That history makes the sentence notable, since the tribunal’s ruling shows a war-era leader losing the benefit of the doubt his diplomatic career once carried. It shows the tribunal treating a sitting head of state’s wartime record the same way it treats any other defendant’s record.

The Kosovo Specialist Chambers sits in the Netherlands, not in Kosovo. That design choice was deliberate. It insulates the process from domestic political pressure. KLA veterans still hold significant public support inside Kosovo, which made a domestic trial politically difficult.

How Kosovo and Serbia are reacting

Kosovo’s government has largely stayed quiet on the verdict. The case splits public opinion. Some Kosovars see KLA fighters as liberators of their country. Others focus on the documented abuses the tribunal has now confirmed in court. Serbian officials have long accused the KLA of violence against Serb civilians during the war. They welcomed the conviction as overdue. The charges against Thaci, however, centered on Kosovar Albanian victims rather than Serb ones, a detail that complicates the reaction on both sides.

What comes next in the case

An appeal could take years to resolve. The Kosovo Specialist Chambers has no fixed appellate timeline. Thaci will serve his sentence outside Kosovo. The tribunal has no prison facility inside the country itself. Other KLA-era figures still face related proceedings before the same chambers. This verdict is unlikely to be the tribunal’s last major ruling on the war.

Global coverage of accountability efforts around the global state of democracy has tracked how war-crimes tribunals shape public trust in institutions. The Hague ruling arrives during a week when world leaders are already gathering for the UN General Assembly’s high-level week, where accountability and rule-of-law questions are likely to come up on the sidelines. The EU’s own posture toward the Balkans has also been shaped by its broader approach to sanctions and enforcement against Russia. Both cases form part of a wider European push to show its legal institutions carry real weight.

Frequently asked questions

Who is Hashim Thaci?

Thaci was a Kosovo Liberation Army political leader during the 1998-99 war. He later served as Kosovo’s prime minister and then president. He resigned in 2020 to face the tribunal’s charges.

What was Hashim Thaci convicted of?

He was convicted of murder, torture, cruel treatment and arbitrary detention. The charges relate to the deaths of 96 people during the KLA’s war against Serbian security forces.

Where is the Kosovo Specialist Chambers located?

The tribunal sits in The Hague, Netherlands. Kosovo law created it specifically to try KLA-era crimes.

Can Hashim Thaci appeal the sentence?

Yes. Both Thaci’s defense and the prosecution are expected to file appeals. Prosecutors had sought a 45-year sentence.

Will Thaci serve his sentence in Kosovo?

No. The Kosovo Specialist Chambers has no prison facility in Kosovo. Thaci will serve his term abroad, under an agreement with an EU member state.

Sources

• Al Jazeera — Former Kosovo President Hashim Thaci sentenced to 25 years for war crimes. aljazeera.com
• NPR — Kosovo’s ex-President Thaci convicted of war crimes, sentenced to 25 years in prison. npr.org
• CBC News — Former Kosovo president Hashim Thaci sentenced to 25 years for 1990s war crimes. cbc.ca