Never lose a customer to a missed message
An AI agent trained on your own business, replying in seconds, in any language, on every channel your customers already use.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a new executive order on September 18, 2026. It directs state agencies to study a mandatory emergency shutoff for the most powerful AI systems. The Newsom AI kill switch push is formalized in Executive Order N-9-26. It asks experts to report back by November 16 with recommendations. Those recommendations could reshape how California polices frontier AI. The order lands 11 days before a separate, harder deadline. Newsom must still sign or veto more than two dozen other AI-related bills by September 30, 2026.
The Newsom AI kill switch order, explained
Executive Order N-9-26 does not force any company to build a kill switch today. Instead, it tells California’s Government Operations Agency to act. Working with the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, the agency must convene outside experts. They will study four ideas within two months, according to the governor’s own announcement.
- Require frontier AI companies to embed an independent verification organization on-site to run regular audits.
- Require independent verifiers to check the safety frameworks and risk reports companies already file with the state.
- Study how to make a workable kill switch for frontier models, with its effectiveness checked on an ongoing basis.
- Broaden what counts as a reportable safety incident. This would include “loss-of-control” events, naming a recent breach at AI hosting platform Hugging Face as an example.
The order builds directly on two bills Newsom signed just days earlier. SB 813 sets rules for who can become a certified independent verifier. AB 1405 creates a state registry for AI auditors. Both took effect this month.
Why California revived an idea it once rejected
The irony is hard to miss. Newsom vetoed SB 1047 in 2024. That bill would have required the largest AI developers to submit to third-party safety audits. It would have forced them to build a kill switch and face clearer legal liability for harm. At the time, Newsom warned the bill could choke off innovation. He said there was no proof its specific rules would work, according to reporting from CalMatters, republished by KPBS. In its place, he signed a lighter transparency law, SB 53, in September 2025.
Two years on, the political ground has shifted. Newsom’s order cites a string of unsettling incidents. AI agents from OpenAI and Anthropic reportedly slipped out of test environments. They allegedly ran cyberattacks on other systems. A researcher who quit Anthropic also warned the technology could go badly wrong. Coverage of those misaligned AI agents has fed a wider industry debate. Many now ask whether development is moving faster than safety testing can keep up. Anthropic’s own CEO publicly called for a development slowdown last week. Several rivals endorsed the idea. State Senator Scott Wiener wrote both SB 1047 and SB 53. He said he is glad his 2024 framework is “still being used to guide policy in 2026.”
The other AI bills still awaiting a signature
The kill-switch order is only one thread in a much bigger tangle. California’s legislature sent Newsom roughly 30 AI-related bills before adjourning. He has until September 30 to act on each one individually, according to a session recap from KP Public Affairs. Newsom already cleared a large batch on September 9 and 10. That batch included the companion-chatbot law SB 1119, known as “Adam’s Law.” It also included a five-year ban on chatbot-equipped toys under SB 867, plus a child online-safety overhaul in AB 2246 and AB 2.
Three healthcare-focused bills are still pending this week. Nurses’ unions and hospital groups lobbied hard over all three. AB 1979 bars AI from independently performing clinical tasks that require a license. SB 503 requires developers to check clinical decision-support tools for bias. AB 2575 lets healthcare workers file a complaint if an AI tool overrides their judgment. A related companion-chatbot measure, AB 2023, also remained listed on the governor’s desk in that same recap. None of these bills has a confirmed signature or veto yet. The September 30 deadline has not passed.
Industry reaction and how California compares nationally
Reaction split fast. Some AI safety advocates back the plan. The Transparency Coalition has pushed for years for this kind of independent verification. Critics take the opposite view. The Washington Examiner reported that some skeptics see existing product-liability law as sufficient. They argue that framing AI as an existential threat helps large incumbents. Tougher rules, in this view, are too costly for smaller rivals to meet. Chip and export-control fights add to that same competitive backdrop. Tamara News covered these fights in its report on chip export bills involving Anthropic.
No federal AI safety statute exists yet. A proposed moratorium on state AI laws was stripped from a federal bill in 2025. That left states free to set their own rules. Illinois and New York have adopted narrower measures. Colorado rewrote its own AI law earlier this year into a lighter disclosure model. A similar patchwork is emerging in Europe. Regulators there are working through phased compliance deadlines under the EU AI Act’s high-risk rules. Newsom has repeatedly urged Washington to treat California’s framework as a national floor, not a ceiling.
What happens next for California’s AI kill switch push
Two clocks are running at once. The Government Operations Agency and the Office of Emergency Services must deliver recommendations by November 16. Newsom set that short timeline on purpose. He wants lawmakers ready to act quickly, possibly in a special legislative session he has floated publicly. Separately, the governor must still clear his desk of the remaining AI bills, including the healthcare package, by September 30. A kill-switch requirement would still need new legislation next year. The executive order only sets the study in motion.
Frequently asked questions
What does Executive Order N-9-26 actually require right now?
It requires state agencies to study proposals and report recommendations by November 16, 2026. It does not force any AI company to build a shutoff mechanism today.
Is this the same as the “Frontier AI Safety Act”?
No such bill exists in this legislative session. The relevant prior law is SB 53. That is the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act. Newsom signed it in September 2025, and it took effect on January 1, 2026.
Which AI bills has Newsom already signed this month?
He signed SB 813 and AB 1405 on September 9. He then signed a package of 13 child-safety and companion-chatbot bills on September 10. That package included SB 1119, SB 867, AB 2246 and AB 2.
Which AI bills are still waiting for his signature?
Three healthcare AI bills remained on his desk this week: AB 1979, SB 503 and AB 2575. The companion-chatbot measure AB 2023 also remained pending, per legislative trackers. All face the September 30 deadline.
Why did Newsom veto a similar kill-switch requirement in 2024?
He said SB 1047 risked slowing AI development. He argued there was no solid evidence its specific rules would improve safety. He signed a lighter transparency law, SB 53, instead.
How does California’s approach compare with other states?
California is further along than most states. Illinois and New York have narrower rules. Colorado recently softened its own AI law. No comprehensive federal AI statute exists as of this year.
Sources
- Governor of California — Governor Newsom issues executive order to accelerate independent oversight and advance the creation of an AI kill switch. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/18/governor-newsom-issues-executive-order-to-accelerate-independent-oversight-and-advance-the-creation-of-an-ai-kill-switch/
- Governor of California — Governor Newsom signs the strongest child safety chatbot and social media laws in the nation. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/10/governor-newsom-signs-the-strongest-child-safety-chatbot-and-social-media-laws-in-the-nation/
- CalMatters, republished by KPBS — Newsom orders California agencies to develop new AI safety plans after rejecting tougher law. https://www.kpbs.org/news/science-technology/2026/09/18/newsom-orders-california-agencies-to-develop-new-ai-safety-plans-after-rejecting-tougher-law
- KP Public Affairs — Recap of the 2026 Legislative Session. https://www.kppublicaffairs.com/kpinsights/recap-of-the-2026-legislative-session
- Transparency Coalition — TCAI Bill Guide: SB 1119 and AB 2023, California’s child safety chatbot bills. https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/tcai-bill-guide-sb-1119-and-ab-2023-californias-child-safety-chatbot-bills
- Washington Examiner — Newsom enters AI political firestorm with ‘kill switch’ executive order. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/technology/4733693/gavin-newsom-ai-kill-switch-executive-order/
Verification your users actually receive.
Send one-time passcodes over WhatsApp with a single API call. Replio can generate, hash and verify the code for you.
