Leaders of the ten-member bloc adopted the BRICS New Delhi Declaration on 12 September, closing a summit that had looked, for two days, as though it might not produce a joint text at all. The 140-point document papers over real disagreement on the Middle East while making one concrete institutional demand: a bigger seat for India and Brazil at the United Nations.
The declaration was published in full by India’s Prime Minister’s Office under the title “Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability”.
The Security Council line is the headline
China and Russia — both permanent members with vetoes — signed text supporting a greater role for India and Brazil at the Security Council.
Read that carefully. Supporting “a greater role” is not the same as backing new permanent seats with veto power, and no permanent member has ever ratified a reform that dilutes its own position. The wording is a diplomatic win for New Delhi and Brasília in the sense that it exists at all; it commits nobody to a vote.
Still, getting Beijing to sign anything on Indian Security Council ambitions is a shift worth noting, and it happened at a summit India hosted, alongside a Modi-Xi bilateral. Outlook India’s summary of the takeaways treats the clause as the summit’s principal deliverable for the host.
India’s incentive for hosting was largely this. A rotating summit presidency is an opportunity to put national priorities into a consensus text, and New Delhi used it on Security Council language and on the Kashmir condemnation. Whether either translates into anything is a separate question from whether they were worth extracting.
Where the bloc actually agreed
The economic sections carry the least ambiguity, because they describe work already underway:
- Cross-border payments and local-currency settlement. Members committed to expanding trade settled in their own currencies rather than dollars.
- Opposition to unilateral measures. The text opposes unilateral trade tariffs, secondary sanctions, and carbon border adjustment mechanisms it deems non-compliant with World Trade Organization rules.
- Sectoral cooperation. Artificial intelligence, health, energy, food security and supply-chain resilience all get expanded frameworks.
The carbon border language is aimed squarely at the European Union’s border levy, which BRICS members have consistently characterised as protectionism dressed as climate policy. That is the bloc’s own framing, and European officials reject it.
No common currency, again
The declaration did not launch a BRICS currency. It has not launched one at any previous summit either, despite recurring speculation that it might.
What the bloc is actually building is narrower and more plausible: payment rails and bilateral local-currency arrangements that let members trade without routing through dollars. That reduces exposure to US financial leverage at the margin. It does not create a reserve currency, which would require a level of monetary and fiscal integration that members with this range of interest rates and capital controls are nowhere near.
The Middle East language, and what it cost
The hardest negotiation was over West Asia, with the UAE and Iran both inside the tent and on opposite sides of an active conflict.
The agreed text calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, endorses a two-state solution along 1967 boundaries with East Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital, and supports full UN membership for Palestine. It also condemns the April terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir — a clause India pushed for.
Unanimity on that text, among members including Iran, Russia, China, the UAE, Egypt and Ethiopia, required days of drafting. It is a measure of how far the bloc will go to avoid publishing a split, and of how little the declaration therefore binds any individual member’s conduct.
What the summit tells you about BRICS
The bloc’s expansion to ten members bought it a larger share of world population and output, and cost it coherence. A group containing both Iran and the UAE, both India and China, cannot easily take positions with teeth.
What it can do — and what New Delhi delivered — is generate consensus documents that establish alternative framings of the international order: on trade rules, on sanctions, on who belongs at the top table. Those framings accumulate. They also survive contact with the fact that members disagree, because they cost nothing to sign.
The practical test is whether local-currency settlement volumes actually rise over the next year. That is measurable, unlike most of the rest.
Common questions about the declaration
Which countries are in BRICS now?
Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates.
Did BRICS agree to create a shared currency?
No. The declaration focuses on local-currency trade settlement and cross-border payment systems. No common currency was announced.
Does the declaration change India’s UN Security Council status?
No. It records China’s and Russia’s stated support for India and Brazil playing a greater role. Any actual change to Security Council membership requires UN Charter amendment, which permanent members can block.
What did BRICS say about tariffs?
The bloc opposed unilateral tariffs, secondary sanctions, and carbon border adjustment measures it considers inconsistent with WTO rules.
Is the declaration legally binding?
No. Summit declarations are political statements of intent. They create no enforceable obligations on signatories.
Why was the Middle East section difficult?
Because Iran and the UAE are both members and are on opposing sides of the current conflict. Reaching agreed language required extended negotiation.
Related reading on the shifting trade order: the US-Canada tariff exchange and the Trump-Xi summit in Washington.