Open

Category Archives: Canada

Tamara News  /  Blog  /  Canada
16 Sep 2026
Canada Express Entry draw

Canada Express Entry Draw Sends 2,000 Invitations at CRS 519

Categories Canada, Immigration

Canada issued 2,000 invitations to apply for permanent residence in a Canada Express Entry draw held on 15 September 2026, with the Comprehensive Ranking System cut-off for the Canadian Experience Class settling at 519 points — two below the round two weeks earlier.

Quick navigation

The 15 September round

The round was category-restricted to the Canadian Experience Class, the stream for candidates who already hold skilled work experience in Canada. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada issued 2,000 invitations, with the department’s own timestamp recorded at 10:21:41 UTC.

The tie-breaking rule did significant work in this draw. Where multiple profiles sit exactly on the cut-off, IRCC admits those submitted before a stated date and time. That timestamp reached back to 26 March 2026 — close to six months before the round itself, which indicates a deep pool of profiles clustered at 519.

Specialist trackers including Moving2Canada and Canadian immigration practices reported the same figures independently. IRCC publishes each round on its ministerial instructions page, which is the authoritative record.

Where the CRS line is heading

The Canadian Experience Class threshold peaked at 523 in the 18 August round, the highest of the year. The 1 September round came in at 521, and 15 September at 519. That is a downward drift of four points over a month.

Read carefully, it is a mild trend rather than a door opening. Single rounds are noisy: invitation volume, the mix of categories drawn and the size of the pool all move the line. A candidate sitting at 510 should not read a four-point drift as a forecast. A candidate at 517 or 518 has reason to keep the profile current.

A record year for invitations

Volume, not the threshold, is the more striking number this year. As of the 4 September round, trackers counted 53 Express Entry rounds in 2026 and more than 126,000 invitations issued — a record annual total, with almost four months of the year still to run.

That combination — record invitation volume alongside historically high cut-off scores — tells you the pool has grown faster than the draws. More candidates are competing for a larger number of places, which is why the threshold has held up despite the issuance rate.

How the levels plan shapes the draws

Express Entry rounds are downstream of the Immigration Levels Plan. Canada’s 2026-2028 plan, summarised by practitioners tracking the file, sets a target of 380,000 new permanent residents in 2026, held flat for the following two years.

Within that, the plan allocates 109,000 places to skilled workers in 2026, rising to 111,000 in 2027 and 2028. The plan brings back the Federal High Skilled category, leans harder on the Provincial Nominee Program, and keeps a deliberate focus on helping people already in Canada transition to permanent residence — which is precisely why Canadian Experience Class rounds keep appearing.

The money side of the system also tightened this year. Our report on the revised study permit proof-of-funds requirement covers the change most likely to affect candidates building Canadian experience through study.

Planning around the next round

IRCC does not publish a draw calendar in advance, and the interval between rounds has varied. Candidates within a few points of the line should do three things: confirm language test validity, since expiry silently drops a profile’s score; update work experience the day it crosses a year boundary; and keep an eye on provincial nominations, which the levels plan has made a larger share of the intake.

For comparison across destinations, our coverage of Australia’s visa processing priorities and of green card category retrogression in the United States sets out how the other two large skilled-migration systems are rationing places this year.

Express Entry questions answered

What was the CRS cut-off in the 15 September Express Entry draw?

The Canadian Experience Class round on 15 September 2026 used a Comprehensive Ranking System cut-off of 519 points.

How many candidates were invited?

IRCC issued 2,000 invitations to apply, the same volume as the 1 September round.

What is a tie-breaking timestamp?

Where several profiles sit on the cut-off score, the department admits those submitted before a stated date and time. For this round the timestamp reached back to 26 March 2026.

Is the CRS threshold falling?

The trend has been gently downward since the 18 August round set the year’s high of 523 for the Canadian Experience Class, but two points is a small move and single rounds are noisy.

How many invitations has Canada issued in 2026?

Trackers counted more than 126,000 invitations across 53 rounds as of the 4 September draw, a record annual total.

What does the 2026-2028 levels plan target?

The plan sets 380,000 new permanent residents in 2026 and holds that level for the following two years, with 109,000 places for skilled workers in 2026 and 111,000 in each of 2027 and 2028.

More immigration reporting

12 Sep 2026
A red maple leaf, symbolizing Canada as it raises the Canada study permit funds requirement

Canada Just Raised the Price of Studying There — Here’s the New Number

Categories Canada, Immigration

Prospective international students weighing Canada against other destinations now need a noticeably bigger bank balance to qualify. The new Canada study permit funds threshold requires a single applicant to show CAD $23,448 in available money, on top of tuition and travel costs. It is part of a wider set of immigration changes taking effect this month.

Canada study permit funds requirement explained

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada updated its proof-of-funds figure this month. The change is part of a broader September 2026 policy package covering study permits, express entry and processing standards. The updated amount reflects Canada’s official low-income cutoff calculations, which the government revises periodically to track the actual cost of living in the country (Immigration News Canada). Applicants with accompanying family members face additional, higher thresholds on top of the base figure.

Stack of bills, representing the savings students need under the new Canada study permit funds rule

Other Canada immigration changes bundled into September

The proof-of-funds increase is one of several updates IRCC introduced this month. New rules governing artificial intelligence in immigration and refugee proceedings took effect September 7. They restrict how AI-generated or AI-altered evidence can be submitted to the Immigration and Refugee Board. Separately, Canada’s special permanent residence pathway for eligible Hong Kong residents stopped accepting new applications. Citizenship certificate processing times have also stretched, to roughly 33 months, according to IRCC’s own September data release.

Why the funds requirement matters for prospective students

Proof of funds is one of the most common reasons study permit applications are refused. A higher threshold means applicants need to plan further in advance. They must accumulate qualifying savings, or secure a Canadian bank draft, education loan or scholarship documentation that meets IRCC’s evidentiary standards. Education agents and international student advisors typically recommend applicants confirm the current figure directly on IRCC’s website before submitting an application, since the amount can change between application seasons.

What happens next for applicants

The new threshold applies to study permit applications submitted from the effective date forward. It is not retroactive to permits already granted. Canadian designated learning institutions and immigration consultants are expected to update their own advising materials in the coming weeks to reflect the change. Applicants should confirm current figures before finalizing a study plan, given how frequently these thresholds are adjusted.

For more on how Canada’s immigration system is evolving this year, see Tamara News’ coverage of the new AI rules for immigration proceedings and the latest visa bulletin affecting other immigration pathways.

How Canada compares to other study destinations

The increase widens the financial gap between Canada and some competing study destinations. Comparisons depend heavily on individual program costs, currency movements and each country’s own proof-of-funds or maintenance requirements. Education consultants who advise prospective students across multiple destinations say Canada remains competitive on post-graduation work rights and pathways to permanent residence, even as its upfront financial bar rises. Applicants increasingly weigh the total cost of a multi-year program, not tuition alone, when comparing countries.

Practical steps for applicants building their finances

IRCC accepts several forms of proof. These include bank statements showing the required balance held for a minimum period, a Guaranteed Investment Certificate from a participating Canadian financial institution, or proof of a Canadian student loan. Advisors typically recommend applicants begin building qualifying savings well before they plan to apply. Large last-minute deposits can sometimes draw additional scrutiny from visa officers assessing the genuineness of an applicant’s funds. Families relying on sponsorship from relatives are also advised to document the source of those funds, not just the current balance.

Where this leaves Canada’s international education sector

Canadian colleges and universities have leaned heavily on international student tuition revenue in recent years. A higher financial bar for entry could weigh on application volumes from students choosing between Canada and other English-language study destinations. Institutions have generally supported measures that improve the integrity of the study permit system. They argue that clearer financial standards help protect genuine students from being crowded out by fraudulent applications, even as they acknowledge the higher threshold may push some prospective students toward other countries.

Frequently asked questions

  • How much money must a single study permit applicant show? CAD $23,448, on top of tuition and travel costs.
  • Does the requirement increase for applicants with family members? Yes, additional dependents raise the required amount above the base single-applicant figure.
  • When did the new threshold take effect? It was included in IRCC’s September 2026 update to immigration processing rules.
  • What other Canada immigration changes came with it? New AI-use rules for immigration and refugee proceedings, the closure of a Hong Kong-specific permanent residence pathway, and citizenship processing times extending to about 33 months.
  • Does the new amount apply to permits already issued? No, it applies to new study permit applications going forward, not to permits already granted.

Sources

01 Sep 2026
Canada temporary resident tracking

Canada Doesn’t Know Who’s Actually Leaving — A New Report Says Fix It

Categories Canada, Immigration

A council of immigration experts says Canada temporary resident tracking is broken, and Ottawa is flying blind on who actually leaves the country when a permit expires. The warning comes from the C.D. Howe Institute’s immigration targets council in a submission released August 30, 2026.

The Numbers Driving the Warning

Federal figures dated June 30, 2026 counted 632,000 people in Canada on study permits. Another 1.5 million held temporary work permits at the same point. Together, temporary residents remain a significant share of Canada’s population even after two years of federal cuts to intake targets.

Canada temporary resident tracking

Statistics Canada estimates temporary residents currently make up about 6.2 percent of the population, or roughly 2.5 million people. The federal government has set a target of bringing that share below 5 percent by the end of 2027.

Why Canada Temporary Resident Tracking Worries the Council

Council chair Parisa Mahboubi says the government’s target relies on an assumption rather than verified data. Ottawa largely assumes people leave once their permits expire, without a reliable system to confirm departures actually happen.

The council includes former immigration minister Jason Kenney alongside academics who study migration policy. Their submission argues that without better exit tracking, nobody, including the government, can say with confidence whether the 5 percent target is realistic or already being missed.

What the Council Wants Ottawa to Do

The submission calls for two changes. First, deeper cuts to temporary resident intake beyond what is already planned. Second, and more urgent according to Mahboubi, a functioning system to track when temporary residents actually exit the country rather than simply assuming compliance.

Canada already collects some exit data through information-sharing agreements with the United States at land borders, but coverage gaps remain, particularly for people who leave by air to destinations other than the US or who overstay without formally departing at all.

How Canada Currently Tracks Departures

Canada shares some border-crossing data with the United States. An information-sharing agreement covers land crossings between the two countries. That system can confirm when someone leaves Canada for the US, but it captures only one exit route among several.

People who fly to other countries fall outside what that data can confirm. So do people who simply remain in Canada after their permit expires without formally departing. The council’s submission argues this gap is large enough to undermine confidence in any national compliance estimate.

Provincial data adds another layer of uncertainty. Health cards, driver’s licenses, and school enrollment records could in theory help confirm whether someone is still in the country, but these systems are not currently linked to federal immigration status data in a systematic way.

Building those links raises its own privacy and jurisdictional questions, since provinces control much of that data independently of the federal government’s immigration mandate.

Mahboubi’s council did not set a timeline for when better tracking should be in place, but framed it as a prerequisite for any credible claim that Canada’s temporary resident population is actually shrinking toward the government’s target.

Opposition critics have echoed parts of the council’s concern. The political debate over intake levels themselves remains far more divided, though, than the narrower, more technical question of how departures get counted.

That narrower question, Mahboubi argues, is where Ottawa could make the fastest progress, since better tracking does not require the same political consensus that setting new intake numbers demands.

What Other Countries Do Differently

Several peer countries, including Australia and the UK, run more comprehensive exit-tracking systems that log departures at all major air, land, and sea points. Those systems let governments report overstay rates with more confidence than Canada currently can.

The C.D. Howe submission points to these systems as a model Canada could adapt, arguing that better data would let policymakers set intake targets based on verified outcomes rather than assumptions about who has already left.

Building a comparable system in Canada would likely require new agreements with airlines and closer coordination between IRCC, the Canada Border Services Agency, and provincial governments that currently hold pieces of the relevant data separately.

Where the Levels Debate Goes From Here

The council’s submission feeds into the government’s annual immigration levels consultation, which shapes targets for permanent and temporary admissions in the years ahead. Ottawa has not yet responded formally to the recommendations.

Study permit holders and temporary workers already navigating a tighter Canadian system, including recent caps on the Post-Graduation Work Permit’s eligible fields of study, are likely to face continued scrutiny as this debate over tracking and targets plays out over the coming months.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many temporary residents does Canada currently have?

Statistics Canada estimates about 2.5 million temporary residents, roughly 6.2 percent of the population, as of mid-2026.

What is Canada’s target for temporary residents?

The federal government aims to bring temporary residents below 5 percent of the population by the end of 2027.

Why does the C.D. Howe Institute say tracking is a problem?

The council argues Ottawa assumes people leave when their permits expire without a reliable system to confirm departures, making the 5 percent target hard to verify.

Who is on the C.D. Howe Institute’s immigration targets council?

The council is chaired by economist Parisa Mahboubi and includes former immigration minister Jason Kenney along with academics who study migration policy.

Related Coverage on Tamara News

Sources

01 Sep 2026
Canada Hong Kong PR pathway

Canada’s Hong Kong ‘Lifeboat’ Just Closed Its Doors

Categories Canada, Immigration

Canada’s Hong Kong PR pathway stopped accepting new applications on August 31, 2026. The temporary program, known informally as the “lifeboat” scheme, gave eligible Hong Kong residents in Canada a faster route to permanent residence. It closed exactly as scheduled, with no extension announced.

What the Canada Hong Kong PR Pathway Covered

Ottawa introduced the pathway in 2021 through two streams. Stream A covered graduates of Canadian post-secondary institutions. Stream B covered people with recent Canadian work experience. Both required applicants to hold Hong Kong status and meet specific education or work criteria tied to their time in Canada.

Canada Hong Kong PR pathway

The policy responded to Hong Kong’s 2020 national security law, which Canada and several other governments said had eroded the territory’s autonomy and civil freedoms. It offered a dedicated, faster track separate from Express Entry and other economic immigration streams.

The Numbers Behind the Program

As of June 30, 2026, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada had received roughly 30,315 applications under the policy. Counting family members, that figure covers about 48,560 people. IRCC had already approved more than 8,600 of those applications, covering about 13,485 people.

Those figures show a program that processed a meaningful but modest share of Hong Kong’s diaspora in Canada relative to the number of people who left the territory since 2020.

Application volume climbed steadily through 2024 and 2025 as word spread among Hong Kong communities in Toronto and Vancouver, the two cities where most applicants under both streams had settled before filing.

What Happens to Applications Already Filed

IRCC will continue processing every application submitted on or before August 31, 2026. Applicants who filed before the deadline do not need to take any new action because of the closure; their cases proceed under the rules that applied when they applied.

Anyone who missed the deadline no longer has access to Stream A or Stream B specifically. Other permanent residence routes, including Express Entry and provincial nominee programs, remain open to Hong Kong applicants who qualify under their general criteria.

Why Ottawa Let the Program Expire

Canada framed the pathway as temporary from the start, tied to conditions in Hong Kong after 2020 rather than a permanent immigration category. Officials gave applicants years of advance notice about the August 31 end date, unlike some policy changes that land with little warning.

The closure also fits a broader pattern this year. Canada has trimmed several temporary and special-status immigration streams as it works toward lower overall admission targets, a shift that has touched programs well beyond the Hong Kong pathway.

Advocacy groups representing Hong Kong Canadians had pushed for an extension in the months before the deadline, citing ongoing political conditions in the territory. IRCC did not change course, and the program closed on schedule.

What Happens If You Missed the Deadline

Former Hong Kong pathway hopefuls now compete through Canada’s general economic immigration system rather than a dedicated track. That means meeting Express Entry’s points thresholds or qualifying under a provincial nominee stream, both of which carry different requirements than the closed Hong Kong-specific program.

Immigration consultants recommend reviewing eligibility for Express Entry’s existing categories. Work experience and education gained in Canada under the former Hong Kong pathway criteria can often still count toward points in the general system.

British Columbia and Ontario, the two provinces where most Hong Kong applicants settled, also run provincial nominee streams that sometimes favor candidates with existing local work history, a detail worth checking against each province’s current criteria.

Applicants weighing their remaining options should confirm current eligibility directly with IRCC or a licensed immigration consultant, since program criteria can shift between the levels-plan updates that Ottawa issues each year.

The closure leaves a gap in Canada’s immigration offerings for a community that leaned on this pathway heavily since 2021, and no government official has signaled a replacement program is under consideration.

Community organizations that supported applicants through Stream A and Stream B say they will keep offering guidance on general immigration routes, even without a dedicated Hong Kong-specific program to point clients toward going forward.

Anyone unsure whether their application counts as filed before the August 31 cutoff should contact IRCC directly. A confirmation receipt showing the submission timestamp is the clearest evidence a case still qualifies under the old rules.

Keep that receipt on file for the full length of processing. IRCC may request proof of the original filing date if a case takes an unusually long time to resolve.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I still apply for Canada’s Hong Kong PR pathway?

No. Both Stream A and Stream B stopped accepting new applications on August 31, 2026, and there is no announced extension.

What happens to my application if I applied before August 31, 2026?

IRCC continues processing applications submitted on or before the deadline under the rules in place when they were filed.

How many people used the Hong Kong pathway before it closed?

IRCC had received about 30,315 applications, covering roughly 48,560 people, as of June 30, 2026, with more than 8,600 applications already approved.

What immigration options remain for Hong Kong residents in Canada?

General routes including Express Entry and provincial nominee programs remain open to applicants who meet their standard eligibility criteria.

Related Coverage on Tamara News

Sources

23 Aug 2026
proof of funds UK Canada Australia 2026, Sydney Opera House

The Real Price Of Proof Of Funds: UK Vs Canada Vs Australia

Categories Canada, Immigration, Uk

Three countries, three completely different answers to one question: can you actually afford to land? The proof of funds UK Canada Australia comparison catches out more applicants than almost any other checklist item, because the numbers sit worlds apart and one of the three destinations never publishes a number at all. Skip this check and an otherwise strong file can stall at the financial-capacity stage, sometimes after the visa fee has already cleared.

By the Tamara News editorial desk. Last updated 23 August 2026.

What This Comparison Covers

The UK’s Exact Number: £1,270

Britain is the only one of the three with a single, published figure. Skilled Worker applicants need to show £1,270 held in a personal account for 28 consecutive days before applying, unless a fully A-rated sponsor certifies on the Certificate of Sponsorship that it will cover maintenance for the first month. The Home Office is specific about how the money must sit: it has to belong to the applicant or their partner, not a parent or a friend, and the 28-day window has to end no more than 31 days before the application date. Miss that window by even a few days and the whole proof resets.

Canada’s Settlement Funds Table

Bilal, a Pakistani IT specialist applying through Express Entry, assumed his Canadian job offer would cover the funds requirement until he checked the fine print. Canada scales its number to family size rather than setting one flat figure: IRCC’s 2026 table lists roughly CAD $15,263 for a single applicant, rising for each additional family member. Applicants with a valid LMIA-backed job offer are exempt, and anyone invited strictly through the Canadian Experience Class skips the requirement entirely. Everyone else under the Federal Skilled Worker or Federal Skilled Trades streams needs to show funds that are liquid, unencumbered by debt, and never borrowed.

Why Australia Has No Published Number

Australia breaks the pattern completely. Skilled visa subclasses such as 189, 190, and 491 carry no fixed dollar threshold, unlike the student visa stream, which does publish a figure near AUD $29,710 a year. Case officers instead assess whether an applicant can cover accommodation, living costs, and a reasonable job search after arrival, and they can request evidence at any point in processing even if none was submitted upfront. That ambiguity trips up applicants who assume a missing number means no requirement at all. Before assuming your file is exempt from scrutiny, run it through our visa eligibility checker rather than guessing.

Not sure which of these three tables actually applies to your file? Get it checked at https://wa.link/i9l1ec

Before You Book a Flight

  • UK: £1,270, held 28 days, sponsor exemption possible.
  • Canada: about CAD $15,263 for a single applicant, scaling with family size.
  • Australia: no fixed figure for skilled visas, but funds can still be requested anytime.
  • All three require money that is genuinely available, not borrowed on paper.

Proof Of Funds Questions We Get Weekly

Can a family member overseas hold the money for me?
For the UK, no. Funds must belong to the applicant or their partner. Canada requires the funds to be in the applicant’s own name as well.

Does a job offer remove the funds requirement everywhere?
Not universally. Canada exempts LMIA-backed offers and CEC invitations, but a UK job offer only helps if the sponsor is A-rated and certifies maintenance on the CoS.

Why does Australia not publish a number for skilled visas?
The Department of Home Affairs assesses settlement capacity case by case rather than setting one threshold, unlike its student visa stream.

What counts as not readily available money?
Funds tied up in property, pensions, or investments that cannot be quickly converted to cash typically will not satisfy any of these three tests.

Keep Reading

Share This Comparison

  • The UK wants £1,270. Canada wants CAD $15,263. Australia won’t tell you a number at all.
  • One of these three countries can request proof of funds at any stage, with no warning.
  • Why a missing published threshold does not mean a missing financial requirement in Australia.

Get Your Number Confirmed Before You Apply

Three tables, three sets of rules, and only one of them ever changes without much notice. Have your file checked against the current figures before you submit anything at https://wa.link/i9l1ec

Sources

  • GOV.UK, Skilled Worker visa knowledge of English and financial requirements, gov.uk, 2026 (T0 official)
  • Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, Proof of funds for Express Entry, canada.ca, 2026 (T0 official)
  • Migratio, Proof of Funds for Australian Visas, migratio.com.au, 2026 (T2, no fixed official threshold exists for skilled visas; cited for context only)

{“@context”:”https://schema.org”,”@type”:”FAQPage”,”mainEntity”:[{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Can a family member overseas hold the money for me?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”For the UK, no. Funds must belong to the applicant or their partner. Canada requires the funds to be in the applicant’s own name as well.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Does a job offer remove the funds requirement everywhere?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Not universally. Canada exempts LMIA-backed offers and CEC invitations, but a UK job offer only helps if the sponsor is A-rated and certifies maintenance on the CoS.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Why does Australia not publish a number for skilled visas?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”The Department of Home Affairs assesses settlement capacity case by case rather than setting one threshold, unlike its student visa stream.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”What counts as not readily available money?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Funds tied up in property, pensions, or investments that cannot be quickly converted to cash typically will not satisfy any of these three tests.”}}]}

Tapay copy tradingGrow your money while you plan your moveTapay auto-copies a live trading strategy to your own account — spot & futures. Start free on demo, go live when you’re ready.Start free →

1 2 3 … 13