Open

Category Archives: Visa Updates

Tamara News  /  Blog  /  Visa Updates
20 Sep 2026
Employment-based visa retrogression immigration office paperwork

Your Green Card Priority Date Could Freeze in the Next 10 Days

Categories Immigration, Visa Updates

The State Department’s September 2026 Visa Bulletin held cutoff dates steady from August, but it came with a warning attached. Employment-based visa retrogression could hit several categories before the fiscal year closes on September 30. High demand is pushing some annual limits toward their ceiling.

The categories most exposed are EB-1 and EB-2 for applicants born in India, along with EB-5 Unreserved. India’s EB-2 category has already become unavailable at points this fiscal year after its prorated limit was reached, a preview of what could happen more broadly in the final days of September.

This is bureaucratic language for a simple fact. The line moved backward, or stopped. Applicants near the front felt it first. Those further back barely noticed. That gap is the whole story here.

The short version: The fiscal year ends September 30. EB-1 India, EB-2 and EB-5 Unreserved are at risk. September cutoff dates held steady from August. India’s EB-2 has already gone unavailable once. New numbers open October 1. Check your priority date now.

What Retrogression Actually Means

A visa category “retrogresses” when the government pulls its cutoff date backward because more people applied than there is annual visa capacity to cover. A category can also become “unavailable,” which pauses new visa issuance in that category entirely until the next fiscal year opens on October 1. Both outcomes leave applicants who were close to their priority date waiting longer than expected.

Why India’s Categories Are Under the Most Pressure

Demand for employment-based green cards from India has outpaced the per-country limits built into US immigration law for years, creating long-standing backlogs. Each fiscal year’s final weeks tend to be when the State Department has the least room to maneuver, since annual number limits are fixed and cannot be exceeded regardless of demand.

What the September Bulletin Actually Says

Cutoff dates across employment-based and family-based categories generally held steady from August to September 2026, with no forward movement but also no retrogression announced in the bulletin itself. The warning is about what could still happen in the final days of the fiscal year if demand continues at its current pace, not something that has already occurred bulletin-wide.

Read the fine print carefully. A steady bulletin is not a guarantee. It is a snapshot. Snapshots change fast in September. Ask your attorney before you assume anything.

The State Department publishes two sets of dates each month: a “final action” chart that governs when a visa can actually be issued, and a “dates for filing” chart that governs when an application can be submitted. Applicants sometimes confuse the two, and immigration attorneys note that a category remaining open on the filing chart does not guarantee the final action chart will not still tighten before September 30.

Why Employment-Based Visa Retrogression Keeps Recurring in September

This is not the first time the government has flagged year-end pressure on employment categories, and it is unlikely to be the last. Annual visa number limits are fixed by statute, while application volume fluctuates based on economic conditions, processing backlogs and employer sponsorship trends that shift from year to year. When those two lines cross late in a fiscal year, the State Department has only one lever available: slow down or pause issuance until the count resets on October 1.

What Applicants Can Do Now

Applicants with pending cases in the affected categories should confirm their priority dates are current before taking any action that depends on visa availability, such as scheduling a final interview or filing to adjust status. Immigration attorneys generally advise against assuming a category will remain available through September 30 in a year when the government has already flagged possible retrogression.

Employers sponsoring foreign workers in the affected categories should also build extra lead time into any planning tied to a specific priority date, since a category that retrogresses can take months to recover once the new fiscal year’s allocation opens.

The numbers at a glance: Fiscal year ends: September 30. Categories flagged: EB-1 India, EB-2, EB-5 Unreserved. September movement: none from August. New numbers open: October 1. Bulletin issued by: US State Department.

Visa Bulletin Questions, Answered

What does “unavailable” mean on the visa bulletin?
It means no more visas can be issued in that category until the new fiscal year begins on October 1.

Which categories are most at risk this year?
EB-1 India, EB-2, and EB-5 Unreserved, according to the State Department’s own guidance.

Did the September bulletin already show retrogression?
No. Cutoff dates held steady from August, but the department warned further movement could come before September 30.

Why does India face more pressure than other countries?
Per-country limits combined with high application volume from India have created backlogs that are worse than in most other countries.

When does the pressure typically ease?
At the start of the new fiscal year on October 1, when annual visa number limits reset.

More Context

Sources

  • Gibney — September 2026 Visa Bulletin Released. gibney.com
  • Murthy Law Firm — September 2026 Visa Bulletin. murthy.com
  • RJ Immigration Law — September 2026 Visa Bulletin: Key Updates, Trends & What to Expect. rjimmigrationlaw.com

20 Sep 2026
USCIS new form editions immigration paperwork on a desk

USCIS Will Now Reject Your Visa Paperwork Over One Missed Date

Categories Immigration, Visa Updates

USCIS began rejecting an old, familiar form this week. Starting September 15, the agency requires the USCIS new form editions of Form I-539 and Form I-765, and it is giving applicants no grace period. File with the previous version, even by mistake, and the filing is bounced back.

The change affects two of the most commonly filed forms in the US immigration system. Form I-539 covers applications to extend or change nonimmigrant status. Form I-765 covers applications for employment authorization. Together they are used by students, exchange visitors and many other visa holders every month.

The short version: USCIS updated I-539 and I-765 on September 15. There is no grace period this time. Old editions are rejected on sight. The new edition date reads 09/15/26. F-1 and J-1 filers are affected most. Always download a fresh copy before filing.

What Changed on September 15

USCIS published revised editions of both forms dated 09/15/26. The new I-539 edition replaces the 08/28/24 version. The new I-765 edition replaces the 08/21/25 version. Anyone filing on or after September 15 must use the current edition or risk rejection.

Unlike many past USCIS form updates, there is no transition window here. Previous revisions often came with a grace period of 30 to 90 days that let applicants use either edition. This time, the cutoff arrived immediately, with no warning window at all.

Why USCIS Moved Without a Grace Period

The revised forms align with a final rule establishing a fixed time period of admission and a new extension of stay procedure for F and J nonimmigrant students, exchange visitors and representatives of foreign information media. Because the forms needed to match the substance of that rule, USCIS treated the update as a hard cutover rather than a phased rollout.

Who Is Most at Risk of a Rejected Filing

Anyone who downloaded a form months ago and kept it saved locally is the most exposed group. Immigration attorneys are warning clients not to reuse a previously downloaded PDF, since the outdated version will not be visually obvious to someone who has not checked the edition date printed on the form itself. A rejected filing can also mean losing a filing date that mattered for maintaining status.

Students on F-1 visas applying for Optional Practical Training and exchange visitors on J-1 status extending their programs are among the largest groups affected, simply because of how often they file these two forms relative to other visa categories.

How the USCIS New Form Editions Fit Into a Bigger Rule Change

The form update is not happening in isolation. It follows a final rule that reshapes how the US admits F and J nonimmigrant students, exchange visitors and foreign media representatives, moving away from the old open-ended “duration of status” model toward a fixed admission period. Because that rule changed what information USCIS needs to process an extension or status change, the agency updated the underlying forms to match, rather than layering a fix on top of forms that no longer captured the right data.

Where This Leaves Applicants

Anyone filing I-539 or I-765 from this point forward should download a fresh copy directly from the USCIS website rather than relying on a saved file, a printed copy, or a version linked from a third-party site that may not have been updated. Checking the edition date in the bottom corner of the form takes a few seconds and avoids a rejection that could otherwise cost weeks. Immigration attorneys recommend building this check into any filing checklist going forward, since USCIS has shown it is willing to enforce a hard cutover without warning applicants individually.

Attorneys also suggest printing a fresh copy right before mailing, not weeks in advance. Forms saved to a computer can quietly go stale. A downloaded PDF does not update itself. Treat the USCIS website as the only trusted source on filing day.

The numbers at a glance: Effective date: September 15. Grace period: none. New I-539 edition: 09/15/26. New I-765 edition: 09/15/26. Old I-539 replaced: 08/28/24. Old I-765 replaced: 08/21/25.

Frequently Asked Questions on the Form Change

Which forms changed?
Form I-539 (Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status) and Form I-765 (Application for Employment Authorization).

Is there a grace period for the old versions?
No. USCIS is rejecting filings on or after September 15 that use an earlier edition.

What edition date should I look for?
The 09/15/26 edition on both forms.

Why did USCIS make this change?
To align the forms with a new rule on fixed admission periods and extension of stay procedures for F and J nonimmigrants and foreign media representatives.

What happens if I file the old version by accident?
USCIS will reject the filing, which can delay your case and, in some situations, affect your maintained status.

Also on Tamara News

Sources

  • USCIS — USCIS to Publish New Editions of Form I-539 and Form I-765; Older Editions Will Be Rejected Starting Sept. 15. uscis.gov
  • RJ Immigration Law — USCIS Updates Forms I-539 and I-765: New Editions Required Starting September 15, 2026. rjimmigrationlaw.com
  • Ellis — New Form I-765 and I-539 Editions Take Effect Sept. 15, 2026: No Grace Period. ellis.com

20 Sep 2026
Boston courthouse steps, where the duration of status rule was paused

A Judge Paused the Rule That Would Cap Student Visas at Four Years

Categories Study Abroad, Visa Updates

In this article

The duration of status rule that would have capped student and exchange visitor stays
at four years is on hold. On 14 September 2026, the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
issued a nationwide preliminary injunction postponing the effective date of the Department of Homeland
Security’s final rule, one day before it was due to take effect. The long-standing duration of status
framework stays in place while the case continues.

What the duration of status rule would have changed

DHS published the final rule on 17 July 2026. It would have ended open-ended admission for F-1 students,
J-1 exchange visitors and I media representatives, and replaced it with fixed admission periods.

Under the rule, F-1 and J-1 holders would generally have been admitted to the end of their programme or
for four years, whichever came first. The grace period after completion would have dropped from 60 days to
30. Anyone needing longer would have had to file for an extension of stay rather than simply remaining in
valid status.

International students at a university fair affected by the duration of status rule
Doctoral programmes routinely run past four years, which is where the rule bit hardest.

Why the court paused the duration of status rule

District Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV took the case. The court cited administrative complexity and the
impracticality of running parallel regulatory frameworks across institutions and students nationwide. In
plain terms, the changeover itself looked likely to cause more disruption than the rule could justify
while its legality remained unresolved.

A preliminary injunction is not a ruling on the merits. It suspends the rule so that the litigation can
proceed without the disputed policy taking effect in the meantime. Courts grant one when the challengers
look likely to win and the harm from letting the policy start would be hard to undo.

Who this affects most

Doctoral candidates carried the sharpest risk. Consider an Indian engineering PhD student in her third
year of a programme that typically runs five to six years. Under the rule she would have hit the four-year
ceiling mid-research and needed an extension of stay filing to continue, with the processing delay that
implies. Under the current framework she simply remains in status while enrolled.

Language programmes, medical residents on J-1 status and foreign correspondents on I visas also fell in
scope. Undergraduates on four-year degrees faced the least exposure, though even they would have lost half
the grace period.

University administrators had their own problem. Running two admission frameworks side by side means
two sets of advising rules, two compliance workflows and two ways to make an honest mistake that costs a
student their status. That practical burden shaped the court’s reasoning.

How this fits the wider immigration picture

This is the second recent instance of a court stopping a DHS rule before it started. It also sits
alongside changes that did take effect, including the stricter public charge test now applied to green
card filings. Our coverage of
what the public charge change does and does not apply to
and
the separate birth tourism rule a court blocked
sets out the pattern. Students weighing alternatives may also want
the latest Canadian Express Entry draw figures.

Where the litigation goes from here

DHS can appeal the injunction to the First Circuit. It can also go back and issue a revised rule that
tries to answer the court’s practical objections. Either route takes months. In the meantime the operative
question for anyone on an F, J or I visa is simple: nothing about your current admission has changed.

Track the case through
NAFSA’s litigation page
and
the Presidents’ Alliance case tracker,
both of which post filings as they land. Your own school’s international office is the source that applies
to your specific record.

Duration of status rule: common questions

Is the duration of status rule in effect right now?

No. A federal court postponed its effective date on 14 September 2026. The existing duration of status framework still applies to F-1, J-1 and I visa holders.

What would the rule have changed?

It would have replaced open-ended admission with a fixed period: the end of the programme or four years, whichever is shorter, plus a 30-day grace period instead of 60 days.

Does the injunction cover everyone or only the plaintiffs?

The court issued a nationwide preliminary injunction postponing the rule’s effective date, not a party-specific order.

Is this a final decision?

No. A preliminary injunction suspends a rule while litigation continues. DHS can appeal, and the case can still be decided either way.

Do I need to file anything differently?

Not because of this order. Your I-20 or DS-2019 and your existing admission terms are unchanged. Check with your designated school official or responsible officer before acting on anything you read online.

Could the rule come back?

Yes. DHS could win on appeal, or issue a revised rule addressing the court’s concerns. Treat the current position as a pause, not a cancellation.

Sources

19 Sep 2026
public charge rule change affects green card application paperwork

US Green Card Rules Just Got Tougher — But Only for New Filers

Categories Immigration, Visa Updates

The public charge rule change took effect on September 18, 2026. It rewrites how U.S. immigration officers judge whether a green card applicant might depend on government help later. The change is not retroactive. It applies only to Form I-485 adjustment-of-status applications postmarked or e-filed on or after September 18, 2026, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

If you already filed, or you file before that date, officers still use the older 2022 standard. If you file on or after September 18, the broader new test applies. That single date now matters more than almost anything else in your application.

What the public charge rule change actually does

The public charge test is not new. U.S. law has long allowed officers to deny a green card on this ground. The test asks whether an applicant is likely, at any time, to become primarily dependent on the government for basic needs like shelter, food, or health care.

public charge rule change: a stack of visa and immigration documents

What changed is the list of factors an officer can weigh. Under the 2022 rule, officers mostly looked at cash assistance programs and long-term institutional care paid for by the government. The USCIS guidance issued August 18, 2026 adds a much longer list of non-cash, means-tested benefits to that review. These include Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, housing assistance, and financial aid for college.

Officers now judge each case under a “totality of the circumstances” standard. No single factor decides the outcome on its own, except one: an insufficient Form I-864 Affidavit of Support can sink a family-based case by itself, per the updated policy manual.

Why the US rescinded the 2022 public charge standard

The Department of Homeland Security published a final rule in the Federal Register on July 20, 2026, formally rescinding the Biden-era 2022 regulation. DHS argues the older rule was too narrow and did not reflect Congress’s intent that immigrants remain self-sufficient.

Immigrant rights groups disagree. The Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC) warns that the broader standard gives individual officers wide discretion, which could produce inconsistent decisions on similar facts. A coalition of 22 states, Washington, D.C., and several cities sued in early September to block the rule. No court has issued an injunction so far, so the rule took effect as scheduled.

Which green card applicants must plan around the new test

The public charge ground of inadmissibility does not apply to everyone. It never applies to U.S. citizens. It also does not apply to most refugees, asylees, and applicants for U visas, T visas, or VAWA-based relief.

The new USCIS policy manual guidance applies specifically to adjustment-of-status applicants filing Form I-485 inside the United States, whether through a family petition or an employer sponsor. It does not apply to admission decisions made by Customs and Border Protection at the border, and it does not govern immigrant or nonimmigrant visa interviews handled by the State Department abroad. Those categories follow separate, evolving guidance.

This matters for anyone weighing an application on the newest I-485 edition, since the form’s public benefits question was rewritten alongside this policy shift.

What happens next for pending and future filers

Anyone with a green card case pending or filed on or before September 17, 2026 keeps the old 2022 standard for that case. USCIS has confirmed the filing date, not the interview date or decision date, is what locks in which rule applies.

Legal challenges are still moving through federal court, and more lawsuits are expected. A judge could pause or narrow the rule later this year. Applicants already stuck in long queues from green card category retrogression should watch both fronts: the litigation and their own priority date.

Expect USCIS to keep updating its policy manual as officers apply the new standard in real cases. Expect litigation updates too, since this fight echoes an earlier one over a similar 2019 rule from the first Trump administration.

How to prepare under the public charge rule change

Talk to a licensed immigration attorney before you file, especially if your household has used any means-tested benefit. A lawyer can review your Form I-864 Affidavit of Support and flag any weak points before an officer does.

Do not panic-withdraw from benefits you or your family legally need. ILRC and other advocates warn this can cause real harm without changing your immigration outcome, since past benefit use before September 18 falls under the older, narrower rule regardless.

Keep records. Officers may ask about income, assets, education, and work history under the “totality of the circumstances” review. Organized documentation makes that conversation faster and less stressful.

Watch your filing date closely. This policy shift is one of several changes reshaping U.S. immigration procedure this year, alongside a separate court fight over student status rules. Applicants filing across multiple categories should track each deadline independently.

Frequently asked questions about the public charge rule change

What is the public charge rule change?
It is a September 2026 USCIS policy shift. It lets officers weigh a wider range of public benefits, including Medicaid and food assistance, when deciding if a green card applicant might depend on government support later.

When did the new public charge rule take effect?
It took effect on September 18, 2026, following a Department of Homeland Security final rule published in July 2026.

Does this affect green card applications already filed?
No. USCIS says applications filed, postmarked, or e-filed before September 18, 2026 stay under the older 2022 standard.

What benefits count under the new standard?
Officers can now weigh cash assistance, Medicaid, CHIP, SNAP, housing assistance, and education financial aid, among other means-tested programs. Social Security, veterans’ benefits, and unemployment insurance do not count.

Could a lawsuit block the public charge rule change?
Multiple states and cities have sued to stop it, but no court had blocked the rule as of its effective date. Future rulings could still pause or narrow it.

Does the rule apply to everyone seeking a US visa?
No. It applies specifically to Form I-485 adjustment-of-status applicants. It does not cover U.S. citizens, most refugees and asylees, or applicants under U visas, T visas, or VAWA.

Sources

17 Sep 2026
Modern towers on the Riyadh skyline, subject of the Saudi Arabia travel advisory reissued in September 2026

Saudi Arabia Travel Advisory Reissued at Level 3 by US

Categories Visa Updates, World

The US State Department reissued its Saudi Arabia travel advisory on 15 September 2026 at Level 3, “Reconsider travel.” Contrary to some coverage describing an escalation, the level did not change. Saudi Arabia has been at Level 3 continuously since 8 March 2026, when the department ordered non-emergency US government employees and their family members to leave the country.

What the reissue did change is narrower and, for people already planning travel, arguably more useful to know.

What actually changed

The department’s own advisory page indicates the update altered no risk indicators and no levels. It refreshed the advisory’s language, and the summary was revised to reflect additional travel restrictions applied to US government employees.

That last detail is the substance. Restrictions on official personnel movement are a proxy for how the department reads conditions on the ground, and they can tighten while the public headline level stays still. A reissue that leaves the number alone but constrains its own staff further is telling you something the number does not.

The risks the advisory names

The advisory cites the risk of Iranian drone and missile targeting of American interests, armed conflict, and terrorism. It also flags two categories travellers routinely underestimate: the possibility of exit bans, which can prevent a person from leaving the country while a dispute or investigation is resolved, and enforcement of local laws that can extend to scrutiny of social media activity, including posts made before arrival.

The area along Saudi Arabia’s border with Yemen carries a Level 4 “Do Not Travel” designation. Yemen itself remains Level 4. The current text is published on the State Department’s travel advisory page, with security reporting for organisations available through OSAC.

Reading advisories without over- or under-reacting

A Level 3 is not a prohibition. It is a recommendation to reconsider, and millions of people travel to Level 3 destinations every year for work, family and pilgrimage without incident. Treating it as a ban misreads it.

Treating it as noise misreads it differently. Advisories carry practical consequences: insurance policies frequently reference them in exclusions, some employers restrict travel by policy at Level 3, and consular assistance is explicitly harder to provide where official personnel are themselves restricted. Those are concrete effects regardless of how any individual assesses the underlying risk.

The regional context

The advisory’s reference to Iranian drone and missile risk connects to the maritime and territorial developments we examined in our report on the Bab el-Mandeb strait, which sits on the shipping route between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Wider disruption to travel this month is covered in our reports on UK airport disruption and, on the health side, CDC travel restrictions tied to Ebola.

Advisory levels, and what they do not tell you

The State Department uses four levels: exercise normal precautions, exercise increased caution, reconsider travel, and do not travel. The system is deliberately coarse, and a single national figure necessarily flattens a country in which risk varies enormously by region — which is why sub-national designations like the Yemen border area exist.

Two limitations are worth understanding. First, advisories are written for US citizens and reflect risks to American interests specifically, including the targeting risk named here. Travellers of other nationalities may face a different risk profile, and their own governments may publish a different assessment of the same country. Comparing two or three national advisories usually gives a better picture than relying on one.

Second, an advisory describes conditions, not probability for any individual. Business travel to a defined compound, pilgrimage under organised arrangements and independent travel across a region carry very different exposure under an identical headline level.

The exit-ban risk most travellers miss

Of the risks the advisory lists, exit bans are the one least understood in advance. An exit ban is an administrative or judicial measure preventing a person from leaving the country while a matter is resolved — commonly a commercial dispute, an unpaid debt, or an ongoing investigation in which the person may be a witness rather than a suspect.

The feature that catches people out is that a ban can attach without the traveller being detained, charged, or in some cases even notified. It is discovered at the airport. Resolution runs on the timetable of the underlying matter, which can mean weeks or longer, and a foreign embassy cannot lift it.

For anyone travelling on business, the practical mitigation is to know whether the entity you are dealing with has outstanding disputes, and to understand that signing on behalf of a local venture can attach personal liability in ways that differ from home jurisdictions.

Before you book

Three checks are worth doing. Confirm the advisory text on the day you book rather than relying on a summary, because reissues happen without headlines. Read your insurance policy’s advisory clause specifically rather than assuming standard cover applies. And if you hold citizenship or residency in the region, note that dual nationals are sometimes treated differently under local law, including in exit-ban situations, in ways that consular assistance cannot fully resolve.

Traveller questions

What level is the Saudi Arabia travel advisory?

Level 3, ‘Reconsider travel’. The advisory was reissued on 15 September 2026 at that level.

Did the September reissue raise the advisory level?

No. Saudi Arabia has been at Level 3 continuously since 8 March 2026. The reissue refreshed the advisory’s language and did not change any risk indicator or the overall level.

What did change in the reissue?

The summary was revised to reflect additional travel restrictions applied to US government employees — a signal that movement constraints can tighten even when the headline level stays the same.

What risks does the advisory cite?

Risk of Iranian drone and missile targeting of American interests, armed conflict, terrorism, the possibility of exit bans preventing departure, and enforcement of local laws including scrutiny of social media activity.

Are any areas rated more severely?

Yes. The area along Saudi Arabia’s border with Yemen is designated Level 4, ‘Do Not Travel’. Yemen itself remains Level 4.

Does a Level 3 advisory affect travel insurance?

It can. Many policies reference government advisories in their exclusions, and cover for a destination under a ‘reconsider travel’ or higher designation is often limited. Policy wording varies, so check before assuming you are covered.

1 2 3 … 62