How a Chip Export Loophole Let Blackwell GPUs Reach China Anyway

A chip export loophole is at the center of a fresh dispute over how effectively Washington is actually policing advanced AI hardware headed toward China. At issue is Aivres, a California-based server maker that is a subsidiary of Inspur Group — a Chinese firm that has been on the US Entity List since 2023. Because Aivres itself was never added to that list, it has been able to legally export advanced Nvidia chips to Southeast Asia, where Chinese companies including ByteDance and Alibaba have reportedly gained access to them anyway.

What the loophole looks like in practice

According to a New York Times investigation cited by Asia Times’ reporting, Aivres exported $5.6 billion in advanced technology to Southeast Asia between April 2024 and February 2026, including more than $3 billion in computers equipped with Nvidia’s most advanced Blackwell chips. Because the export controls target the blacklisted parent company rather than every entity connected to it, the shipments were technically legal even as the hardware ultimately found its way to restricted end users. Inspur’s own stock fell 3.8% on the news, closing at 74.74 yuan (about $11.13).

The policy this loophole is exploiting

The loophole sits inside a broader chip export framework that critics say was already built with gaps. The Commerce Department’s January 13, 2026 regulations, implementing a policy President Trump announced on December 8, permit exports of Nvidia H200 and AMD MI325X chips that were previously banned outright, subject to performance thresholds and a cap limiting exports to 50% of the volume sold to US customers. Analysis from the Council on Foreign Relations estimates the rule could allow roughly one million H200 chips into China annually — potentially lifting China’s AI compute capacity by 250% relative to domestic chips alone — and warns that the certification requirements exporters must meet will be difficult to enforce given the documented military ties of likely buyers such as Alibaba, Tencent and DeepSeek.

Timed to a high-stakes summit

The loophole story broke just as Xi Jinping traveled to the United States on September 24, 2026, coinciding with the UN General Assembly, for the first official US-China AI dialogue of Trump’s second term. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent led the American delegation into those talks, which were meant to set ground rules for exactly this kind of technology transfer — making the Aivres revelations an awkward backdrop for negotiators on both sides.

Congress is trying to close the gap

Two bills aim to plug loopholes like this one. The Remote Access Security Act (RASA) passed the House 369-22 in January 2026 and would extend export controls to remote access, preventing foreign firms from circumventing restrictions by simply renting computing power located overseas rather than shipping hardware outright. The Chip Security Act cleared the House Foreign Affairs Committee in March 2026. Neither has yet become law, leaving exactly the kind of subsidiary-level workaround Aivres used unaddressed for now.

What happens next

Expect scrutiny of Aivres and similar server integrators to intensify, along with pressure on Commerce to either add subsidiaries automatically when a parent company is blacklisted or to fast-track RASA and the Chip Security Act through the Senate. Until one of those changes happens, the current framework leaves room for exactly the kind of technically-legal, practically-circumventing shipments this loophole describes.

More tech and business coverage

Related reading: AMD’s trillion-dollar valuation, the EU AI Act’s new compliance audits, and the Trump-Xi trade summit.

Chip export loophole questions answered

What is the Aivres chip export loophole?

Aivres, a California-based server maker owned by blacklisted Chinese firm Inspur Group, was never itself added to the US Entity List, letting it legally export advanced Nvidia chips to Southeast Asia even though the hardware reportedly reached companies like Alibaba and ByteDance.

How much technology did Aivres export?

A New York Times investigation found Aivres exported $5.6 billion in advanced technology to Southeast Asia between April 2024 and February 2026, including more than $3 billion in computers equipped with Nvidia’s Blackwell chips.

What does current US policy allow?

Since January 13, 2026, Commerce Department rules allow exports of Nvidia H200 and AMD MI325X chips to China under performance thresholds and a cap limiting shipments to 50% of the volume sold to US customers.

What legislation is meant to close loopholes like this?

The Remote Access Security Act (RASA), which passed the House 369-22 in January 2026, and the Chip Security Act, which cleared a House committee in March 2026. Neither has passed the Senate yet.

Why did this surface now?

The loophole story broke as Xi Jinping traveled to the US on September 24, 2026 for the first official US-China AI dialogue of Trump’s second term, led on the US side by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

Sources

Africa’s Growth Engine Just Downshifted — One Country Held Firm

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development trimmed its EBRD Africa growth outlook for Sub-Saharan Africa to 4.8% for 2026, down from an earlier 5.1% projection. The update, published September 24, 2026, pointed to higher oil prices, trade disruption linked to the Middle East conflict, and mounting debt-servicing costs across the region. It flagged Nigeria as one of the few economies whose forecast held steady, thanks to domestic reforms.

EBRD Africa growth outlook reflected in Nigerian business activity

What the EBRD Africa growth outlook actually shows

The EBRD’s downgrade covers Sub-Saharan Africa broadly. It moderates growth to 4.8% in 2026 and 4.7% in 2027, both below the bank’s previous estimates. The bank’s economists cited a familiar mix of pressures. Energy costs have climbed since the year’s Middle East disruptions. Investment flows into the region have weakened, and commodity price swings are hitting exporters unevenly. High debt-servicing costs stood out as a constraint. That leaves many governments with less room to cushion households or businesses against the slowdown.

Nigeria bucks the regional trend

Nigeria’s own forecast held at 4.2% growth for 2026, easing only slightly to 4.0% in 2027. The EBRD attributed that contrast directly to “economic reforms, investment activity and improved external balances.” That resilience places Nigeria alongside Benin, Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana, which the bank noted have completed IMF programs this year. Benin, Kenya, Ghana and Nigeria all received sovereign credit rating upgrades in 2026 too. Those upgrades matter in practice. They typically lower the cost of borrowing on international markets, partially offsetting the regional headwinds the EBRD describes.

Why the slowdown is happening now

Much of the regional pressure traces back to global forces outside any single African government’s control. The wider Middle East conflict has disrupted trade routes and shipping costs this year. Oil-importing economies across the region have felt that directly through higher energy bills. Several currencies remain under pressure at the same time. Debt-servicing costs continue to eat into government budgets that would otherwise fund infrastructure or subsidies. The EBRD’s report frames this as a structural vulnerability, not a one-off shock, since many of these fiscal constraints predate this year’s specific disruptions.

What it means for businesses and investors

A cut from 5.1% to 4.8% is not a collapse. But it does confirm that momentum built earlier in the decade is cooling. Investors weighing exposure to Sub-Saharan African markets will likely watch one thing closely: the credit-rating trajectory in Nigeria, Kenya and Ghana, more than the headline regional number. Those upgrades signal improving fiscal management even as the broader region faces external pressure. Companies with supply chains touching the region should expect continued volatility in energy costs and currency movements through the rest of 2026.

What happens through the rest of 2026

The EBRD typically revisits its regional forecasts twice a year. The next formal update would arrive in the first half of 2027, unless conditions shift sharply enough to warrant an interim revision. In the meantime, expect individual country reports from the IMF and World Bank to add more granular detail. Those reports should show how the debt-servicing burden and Middle East-linked trade disruption are playing out market by market. Oil importers most exposed to higher energy costs will likely feature most.

Frequently asked questions

What is the new EBRD Africa growth outlook for 2026?

The EBRD forecasts Sub-Saharan Africa will grow 4.8% in 2026, down from an earlier 5.1% projection, easing further to 4.7% in 2027.

Why did the EBRD cut its forecast?

The bank cited higher energy costs, trade disruption tied to the Middle East conflict, and weaker investment. High debt-servicing costs are also constraining government budgets across the region.

Is Nigeria affected by the downgrade?

Nigeria’s forecast held at 4.2% growth for 2026, which the EBRD attributed to domestic economic reforms, investment activity and improved external balances.

Which countries received credit rating upgrades in 2026?

Benin, Kenya, Ghana and Nigeria all received sovereign rating upgrades in 2026, according to the EBRD’s report.

When will the EBRD update this forecast again?

The bank typically revises its regional outlook twice a year. The next scheduled update would come in the first half of 2027, absent a major shift in conditions.

How the EBRD’s forecasts get used

The EBRD is one of several multilateral lenders, alongside the IMF and World Bank, whose regional forecasts matter well beyond the report itself. Sovereign investors, credit-rating agencies and multinational companies use them directly when deciding where to allocate capital. A downgrade like this one does not by itself change any country’s credit rating. But it does shape the narrative investors carry into their own risk assessments. That matters most for economies without the kind of recent rating upgrades that Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana and Benin secured this year. Governments in the region often respond to these periodic downgrades by highlighting their own reform programs. Nigerian officials, for instance, have pointed to improved external balances as evidence their economy can outperform the regional trend.

More on the global economy this week

For more on the global economic backdrop shaping this outlook, see our reporting on the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hike and the bond-market selloff in Treasury yields.

Sources

A Federal Court Just Told Kalshi It Isn’t Above State Gambling Law

The 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a Kalshi prediction market ruling on September 25, 2026. It lets states regulate event-contract trading the same way they regulate gambling. The decision rejects Kalshi’s argument that federal oversight of its contracts preempts state gambling law. The Cincinnati-based court’s ruling immediately gives Ohio and Tennessee grounds to treat Kalshi’s sports and event contracts as regulated gambling activity.

Kalshi prediction market ruling affects trading screens showing event contracts

What the Kalshi prediction market ruling decided

Kalshi operates as a federally regulated exchange under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It argued that status meant individual states could not layer their own gambling rules on top of its contracts. The 6th Circuit disagreed. It found that states retain the authority to regulate event contracts that function like wagers on sports results and other outcomes. That holds regardless of federal exchange registration. The ruling does not shut Kalshi down. But it opens the door for state regulators in the 6th Circuit’s jurisdiction. They can require licensing, restrict certain contract types, or block the platform outright.

A split among the federal courts

The decision deepens a growing conflict between appeals courts. The 9th Circuit previously found Kalshi subject to Nevada’s gambling laws, aligning with Friday’s 6th Circuit outcome. The 3rd Circuit reached the opposite conclusion, ruling that New Jersey’s gambling statutes do not reach Kalshi’s contracts. Two circuits now sit on one side and a third on the other. Legal analysts say the Supreme Court may eventually need to step in. The question: are prediction markets federally exempt from state gambling oversight nationwide?

Why regulators are moving now

The timing is not coincidental. New York sued a Kalshi competitor, Polymarket, days before the 6th Circuit ruling, accusing it of running an unlicensed gambling operation. New York Governor Kathy Hochul said plainly that “by running an unlicensed gambling operation, Polymarket has done more than just knowingly violate state law.” Prediction markets have grown quickly over the past two years. Retail traders use them to bet on everything from elections to sports outcomes. State attorneys general and gaming commissions have grown more assertive in response. They increasingly treat that growth as a licensing and consumer-protection issue, not a novel financial product exempt from their reach.

What it means for traders and the industry

For everyday users, the immediate effect depends on where they live. Traders in Ohio and Tennessee could see new restrictions on which Kalshi contracts are available to them. That mirrors how online sports betting is already licensed state by state. The split rulings create genuine uncertainty for the broader prediction-market industry’s expansion plans. A platform now has to navigate different legal standards depending on which federal circuit a user’s state falls under. That holds until the Supreme Court steps in, or Congress writes a uniform federal standard.

What comes next for prediction markets

Kalshi has not said whether it will seek a rehearing or push directly for Supreme Court review. A formal certiorari petition, if filed, would take months to resolve. In the meantime, expect other states within the 6th Circuit’s reach to test similar arguments against Kalshi and rivals like Polymarket. Gaming regulators outside that reach are watching too. The New York case against Polymarket will be an early signal. It will show how aggressively states plan to use their gambling laws against this category of trading platform.

Frequently asked questions

What did the Kalshi prediction market ruling actually decide?

The 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that states can regulate Kalshi’s event contracts as gambling. It rejected the company’s argument that federal exchange registration preempts state oversight.

Which states are directly affected first?

Ohio and Tennessee, both within the 6th Circuit’s jurisdiction, can now apply their gambling laws to Kalshi’s event contracts.

Does this ruling shut Kalshi down?

No. It lets affected states regulate or restrict specific contracts. Kalshi keeps operating in jurisdictions where courts or regulators have not imposed similar restrictions.

Why do different courts disagree on this?

The 9th Circuit sided with state regulation in a Nevada case, matching the 6th Circuit. The 3rd Circuit found New Jersey’s gambling law did not apply to Kalshi, creating a split that could draw Supreme Court review.

Is Polymarket involved in this ruling?

Not directly, but New York sued Polymarket days earlier over similar unlicensed-gambling allegations, showing regulators are pursuing multiple prediction-market platforms at once.

What should traders on these platforms expect?

Traders should expect the availability of certain contracts to vary by state as more regulators test their authority following this decision.

How prediction markets differ from traditional betting

Kalshi and its rivals describe their products as event contracts. These financial instruments pay out based on whether a defined event occurs. The companies market them more like derivatives than a sportsbook wager. Supporters of that framing say event contracts serve a genuine price-discovery function. They let traders hedge real-world risks tied to elections, economic data or corporate outcomes. A traditional bet does not offer that. Critics disagree, including several of the state regulators now asserting authority over these platforms. A contract paying out on a sports score, they argue, is a wager no matter how it is packaged. That is precisely the argument the 6th Circuit accepted this week.

More on this week’s markets

For more on this week’s financial-market backdrop, see our coverage of the stock market’s weekly gains and the bond-market rout in Treasury yields.

Sources

Xbox Just Cut 286 More Jobs — And Merged Four of Its Studios

The Xbox studio consolidation layoffs announced this week cut 286 jobs and merged four studios under Microsoft’s gaming division. The company confirmed the changes after days of reports that a new wave of cuts was coming. The reduction is part of a previously disclosed plan to eliminate 3,200 roles across Xbox by the end of fiscal year 2027.

How the Xbox studio consolidation layoffs unfolded

Reports of the coming cuts surfaced on September 22, with outlets including Pure Xbox describing “hundreds” of expected job losses and speculation about which studios would be affected. According to that reporting, roughly 1,600 of the originally announced 3,200 roles had already been eliminated in an earlier wave, leaving about 1,600 more cuts to come through the rest of fiscal 2027. Microsoft confirmed the details later the same day it was first reported, announcing “four major studio changes and cuts 286 jobs.”

Which studios are affected

Xbox studio consolidation layoffs empty office desk

Early speculation focused on whether Halo Studios would come under closer Activision Blizzard oversight and whether Blizzard itself would see cuts, a claim that was later disputed. Microsoft’s confirmation described four studio changes without naming every affected team in detail. That continues a pattern from earlier 2026 layoffs, in which specific studio-level breakdowns have been slower to emerge than the overall headcount figures.

Part of a longer restructuring story

This wave extends a restructuring effort that has run through most of 2026 across Microsoft’s gaming division. It follows the completion of its Activision Blizzard acquisition and a broader company-wide push to consolidate overlapping teams. The stated rationale has centered on streamlining operations and concentrating resources on larger, higher-priority projects rather than spreading development budgets across many smaller studios.

Microsoft has not offered a detailed public breakdown of cost savings tied to this specific round, consistent with how it handled earlier phases of the 3,200-role plan. Coverage of the broader 2026 tech layoff wave has noted Xbox as one of several major technology divisions reducing headcount, alongside Apple’s Vision Pro unit and other consumer hardware teams. AI-focused divisions at the same companies, by contrast, continue hiring.

What it means for the games coming out of Xbox

Studio consolidations of this kind typically mean projects get folded into other teams’ pipelines, delayed, or in some cases cancelled outright. Microsoft has not confirmed specific title changes tied to this week’s cuts. Developers affected by earlier 2026 waves have described uncertainty about project continuity as one of the harder parts of the restructuring, separate from the immediate job losses. Industry observers say the consolidation pattern mirrors similar moves across the games industry this year, as several major publishers have merged smaller studios into larger production groups to reduce overhead.

Worker advocacy groups within the games industry have continued to call for stronger severance and notice protections for staff affected by consolidation rounds like this one. They point to the repeated waves of cuts across Xbox studios since the Activision Blizzard deal closed as evidence that the restructuring has outlasted its original announced timeline.

What’s left of Microsoft’s layoff plan

With 286 more roles cut this week, on top of the roughly 1,600 already eliminated, Microsoft is now more than halfway through its stated 3,200-role target for Xbox by the end of fiscal 2027. Based on the pace disclosed so far, further waves are likely before that fiscal year closes, though Microsoft has not published a specific schedule for the remaining cuts.

More tech industry coverage

See also: the AI antitrust lawsuit against major labs, the stock market’s AI-driven trade rally, and Oracle’s Project Jupiter delay.

Xbox layoffs: quick answers

How many jobs were cut this week?

Microsoft confirmed 286 job cuts alongside four major studio changes within its Xbox gaming division.

How does this fit into the bigger layoff plan?

It is part of a previously announced target of 3,200 role reductions across Xbox by the end of fiscal year 2027, with roughly 1,600 already cut before this latest wave.

Which studios were merged or changed?

Microsoft described four major studio changes without detailing every affected team; earlier speculation about Halo Studios and Blizzard specifically was not fully confirmed.

Why is Microsoft consolidating Xbox studios?

The company has cited streamlining operations and concentrating resources on larger, higher-priority projects following its Activision Blizzard acquisition.

Are more Xbox layoffs expected?

Based on the disclosed pace toward the 3,200-role target, further cuts are plausible before fiscal year 2027 ends, though Microsoft has not published a specific timeline.

Cited reporting

Trump and Xi Bought Themselves Until January — But Not Much Else

The Trump Xi summit trade truce reached at the White House this week extends an existing tariff ceasefire through January 10, 2027. It buys both governments more time to negotiate a broader deal rather than resolving the underlying dispute. The September 24-26 meeting was the third in-person encounter between the two leaders in under a year, and it produced an extension rather than a breakthrough.

What the Trump Xi summit trade truce covers

The original 11-month truce had been set to expire in November. According to Al Jazeera’s summit preview, the dispute traces back to Trump’s 10% duties on Chinese goods, imposed over fentanyl and immigration concerns, which China answered with levies on US coal, LNG, crude oil and autos, plus restrictions on rare-earth metal exports. Trump later added 12.5% tariffs on 60 trading partners, including China, over forced-labor allegations, widening the dispute beyond a purely bilateral fight.

Taiwan arms sales remain the sharpest edge

Trump Xi summit trade shipping containers at port

Taiwan was expected to come up prominently, and it did. The Trump administration approved an $11 billion arms package for Taiwan in December, with a second $14 billion package currently on hold. Trump has described the sales as “a very good negotiating chip,” language that signals Washington sees Taiwan-related leverage as a bargaining tool in the broader trade relationship rather than a fixed commitment.

AI competition adds a new front

Beyond trade and Taiwan, the two sides discussed what officials describe as “fierce competition” in artificial intelligence development. The US has proposed a new notification mechanism under which each government would alert the other to serious AI incidents that threaten national security. It is an early and narrow step toward managing AI risk between the two largest economies, not a comprehensive framework.

Iran hovered in the background

Given the US-Israel conflict with Iran, that issue was expected to feature prominently in the talks as well. China maintains close ties with Tehran, and some observers suggested Washington might look to Beijing for influence over Iran’s posture. Trump, however, has indicated he does not believe such intervention is necessary, suggesting the Iran track stayed separate from the trade and Taiwan discussions rather than becoming a bargaining chip itself.

Coverage from NPR described the two leaders striking a cordial public tone throughout the three days. Officials on both sides still acknowledged that underlying tensions on trade, technology and Taiwan remained largely where they started.

How markets read the outcome

Equity markets took the extension calmly rather than treating it as either a major relief or a fresh shock. That fits a summit that avoided both a collapse in talks and a comprehensive new agreement. Analysts covering US-China trade said the January deadline gives negotiators a defined runway. They cautioned that previous extensions this year had similarly kicked difficult decisions further down the calendar rather than resolving them.

Business groups on both sides of the Pacific welcomed the extension as preferable to a lapse in the truce. Even so, several trade associations noted that repeated short-term extensions make it harder for manufacturers and exporters to plan around a stable long-term tariff schedule.

The clock now running to January

The truce is now extended to January 10, 2027. That gives both governments roughly three and a half months to negotiate terms on tariffs, rare-earth exports and the still-pending second Taiwan arms package. Analysts following the relationship say the extension avoids an immediate escalation but leaves every major flashpoint, tariffs, Taiwan, and AI, unresolved heading into the new deadline.

More on US-China trade

Related coverage: the Federal Reserve’s latest rate decision, AMD’s trillion-dollar valuation, and Jensen Huang’s comments on AI regulation.

Summit FAQ: trade truce explained

How long does the new trade truce last?

It runs through January 10, 2027, extending the original 11-month ceasefire that had been due to expire in November.

What started the tariff dispute?

Trump’s 10% duties on Chinese goods over fentanyl and immigration concerns, which China answered with levies on US coal, LNG, crude oil and autos plus rare-earth export restrictions.

What is happening with Taiwan arms sales?

An $11 billion package was approved in December; a second $14 billion package remains on hold as Trump calls the sales a negotiating tool.

Did the summit address AI competition?

Yes. The two sides discussed a proposed notification mechanism to alert each other to serious AI incidents threatening national security.

Was Iran part of the summit agenda?

It was expected to come up given the US-Israel conflict with Iran and China’s ties to Tehran, though Trump indicated he sees no need for Chinese intervention.

Summit reporting sources