• Mon - Fri 9.00 - 19.00

Category Archives: Work Permits

Canada Extends Low-Wage LMIA Freeze to Six More Cities

Canada has widened its low-wage LMIA freeze to six more cities. According to CIC News, the freeze now covers Halifax, Fredericton, Kingston, St. Catharines-Niagara, Regina and Lethbridge, and runs from 9 October 2026 to 7 January 2027. Employers in those areas cannot get new low-wage Labour Market Impact Assessments (LMIAs) for non-exempt jobs during that period.

On this page

The six new cities

CIC News reports that 24 labour markets stay under the freeze from earlier rounds, while Kamloops and Chilliwack have been taken off the list. The six additions and the unemployment rates the outlet lists for them are Halifax (6.1%), Fredericton (6.2%), Kingston (6.3%), St. Catharines-Niagara (6.5%), Regina (6.7%) and Lethbridge (6.0%). The article says the list is next scheduled to be updated on 8 January 2027.

How the freeze works

The freeze applies to the low-wage stream of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program in census metropolitan areas where unemployment is 6% or higher. As CIC News describes it, a job counts as low-wage when it pays below 120% of the provincial or territorial median wage. The hourly cut-offs it lists include $36.92 in Ontario, $37.50 in Alberta, $38.40 in British Columbia, $34.62 in Saskatchewan, $31.96 in Nova Scotia and $31.73 in New Brunswick. The outlet says these figures apply to LMIAs received on or after 17 July 2026 and draw on Job Bank data.

In practice, an employer in a listed city offering a job below its province’s threshold cannot start a new hire or a renewal through the LMIA route while the freeze lasts. Jobs paying above the threshold are not caught by the low-wage freeze.

Who is exempt

CIC News lists several exemptions: primary agriculture, construction, food manufacturing, hospitals, nursing and residential care facilities, and private households hiring nurses, childcare providers or personal support workers as in-home caregivers. Employers can also ask for case-specific exemptions for temporary, highly mobile roles such as fair, carnival or concert work.

A worked example

Consider a hypothetical Mexican cook, Laura, whose employer in Regina planned to renew her work permit through a new LMIA at a wage below Saskatchewan’s $34.62 line. Under the freeze as CIC News describes it, that employer could not start the LMIA while the pause lasts, so Laura’s plan would need another route, such as an employer-specific permit not tied to the LMIA stream, a wage offer above the threshold, or a different eligible employer. Her case is illustrative only; anyone in a similar position should confirm the facts with the employer and a regulated adviser.

One related change from August: CIC News notes that on 21 August 2026 Canada’s immigration department extended the concurrent-processing window for in-Canada work permit applications from 30 to 60 days. It also reports that workers who apply to extend before their permit expires may keep working under the old conditions while they wait, provided they stay in Canada.

What comes next

The next review of the affected-area list is scheduled for 8 January 2027, and cities can move on or off depending on local unemployment. Workers and employers should check the current list on the government’s refusal-to-process page before filing. For other recent changes, read our explainer on Canada’s personalised work permit processing times and the Ontario earnings-points pathway. If you are weighing options across countries, our visa eligibility checker can narrow them down. You can also read CIC News on personalised processing times.

Low-wage LMIA freeze: questions answered

What is the low-wage LMIA freeze?

It is a pause on processing low-wage LMIAs in Canadian cities with unemployment of 6% or higher, as reported by CIC News. It now runs from 9 October 2026 to 7 January 2027.

Which cities were added?

Halifax, Fredericton, Kingston, St. Catharines-Niagara, Regina and Lethbridge were added, while Kamloops and Chilliwack were removed.

Does the freeze cancel my current work permit?

The reporting describes a limit on new LMIA-based hiring and renewals by employers, not the cancellation of permits already issued. Check your permit conditions and expiry date.

Which jobs are exempt?

CIC News lists primary agriculture, construction, food manufacturing, hospitals, nursing and residential care, and in-home caregiver roles in private households.

When is the list reviewed next?

The next update to the affected-area list is scheduled for 8 January 2027.

Related coverage: how personalised processing times work.

October 2026 Visa Bulletin: EB-2, EB-3 Dates Move Back

The State Department’s October 2026 Visa Bulletin, the first of fiscal year 2027, shows some employment-based green card categories moving backward for applicants worldwide. The October 2026 Visa Bulletin sets the EB-2 final action date for “all chargeability” at 1 January 2025 and EB-3 at 15 May 2024, and says some Rest of World categories retrogressed to keep issuances within quarterly and annual limits.

In this report

The key dates

Final action dates for October 2026, per the bulletin (numbers are available only to applicants with an earlier priority date):

  • EB-1: current for all chargeability; 1 July 2023 for China; 1 February 2023 for India.
  • EB-2: 1 January 2025 for all chargeability; 1 October 2021 for China; 1 November 2013 for India.
  • EB-3: 15 May 2024 for all chargeability; 8 January 2022 for China; 1 January 2014 for India.
  • EB-3 Other Workers: 1 January 2022 for all chargeability; 1 October 2019 for China; 1 January 2014 for India.

Why dates moved back

The bulletin says retrogression keeps issuances within FY2027 limits, does not name every affected category, and says the situation is being monitored and adjustments may follow. It also notes that the annual limit for Other Workers is reduced by about 150 for FY2027 under a NACARA provision. A summary from law firm Grape Law, reported in its October immigration update, also notes the F4 family category has reached priority dates around October 2011.

How to read it as an applicant

Take a Chinese researcher with an EB-2 priority date of March 2021: under the China column the final action date of 1 October 2021 means that case is current, whereas a worldwide applicant with a 2025 date would not be. Dates apply per country of birth, not citizenship, and USCIS separately publishes which chart adjustment-of-status filers must use each month. Check both before filing. Policy shifts elsewhere, such as the revised public charge assessment, can matter as much as the queue.

What happens next

The Department of State publishes a new bulletin monthly, so November’s will show whether the retrogression deepens. Use our visa eligibility checker to compare pathways, and confirm your own priority date against the official bulletin before acting. See also the H-1B fee ruling.

October 2026 Visa Bulletin: questions

What is a final action date?

The priority date cut-off at which immigrant visa numbers can be issued to applicants in a category.

Which categories moved backward?

The bulletin says some employment-based Rest of World categories retrogressed but does not list them all. Grape Law reports EB-2, EB-3 and EB-3 Other Workers dates went backward.

Is India worse off than China in EB-2?

On these dates, yes: 1 November 2013 for India against 1 October 2021 for China.

Can the dates change again?

Yes. The bulletin says it is monitoring and adjustments may follow.

Where do I check my own date?

The official Visa Bulletin on travel.state.gov and USCIS’s monthly filing chart guidance.

Related coverage: Canada Express Entry trades draw.

A Federal Judge Just Tore Up the $100,000 H-1B Fee. Here’s Why It Won’t Be the Last Word

The H-1B fee struck down this week by a federal judge in California leaves the Trump administration’s $100,000 charge on new H-1B petitions blocked for now, but employers hoping the issue is settled should hold off celebrating — a proposed replacement fee of $103,265 remains under review at the Department of Homeland Security. US District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr., ruling in the Northern District of California on September 30, found the fee policy “arbitrary and capricious” and vacated it entirely, saying the administration failed to consider alternatives or the reliance interests of employers and workers affected by the sudden charge.

It is the second time a federal court has struck down the fee. A Massachusetts judge issued a similar nationwide ruling back in June 2026, finding comparable procedural defects in how the policy was imposed.

Why the H-1B fee struck down ruling matters

Judge Gilliam’s ruling centers on process rather than the underlying policy goal. The court found that imposing a $100,000 fee on H-1B petitions amounted to a “legislative rule” — a substantive change requiring the formal notice-and-comment process under the Administrative Procedure Act — rather than something the administration could simply impose by fiat. “There is no question here that Agency Defendants failed to consider any alternatives or the reliance interests of the regulated parties,” Gilliam wrote in his order, according to court filings reviewed by legal reporters.

The practical effect is that enforcement of the $100,000 fee is enjoined until the administration completes proper notice-and-comment rulemaking — a process that typically takes months and allows the public, employers, and advocacy groups to formally weigh in before a rule takes effect.

H-1B fee struck down: chart of H-1B visa applications by employer

What comes after the H-1B fee struck down decision

The ruling does not mean H-1B fees are off the table permanently. The Department of Homeland Security has a separate, proposed $103,265 fee already under review, and nothing in Gilliam’s decision prevents the administration from pursuing that or a similar charge through the proper rulemaking channel. Given that two separate federal courts have now struck down versions of this policy on nearly identical procedural grounds, any future attempt would likely need to clear the notice-and-comment bar explicitly to survive a legal challenge.

Immigration attorney Charles Kuck, among those who have tracked the litigation closely, has noted that the administration’s repeated attempts to impose steep H-1B fees without formal rulemaking suggest an urgency to raise the cost of the program quickly — an urgency that keeps running into the same procedural wall in court.

What this means for employers and visa holders

For now, employers filing new H-1B petitions are not subject to the $100,000 fee, restoring the prior cost structure while the legal situation remains unsettled. Companies that paid the fee before it was struck down, or that held back petitions due to the cost, will be watching closely for guidance from USCIS on how the agency plans to implement the court’s order in practice. The uncertainty itself has been costly for employers trying to plan hiring around a program whose cost structure has shifted multiple times within a single year.

What to watch next

The key date to watch is whether and when DHS formally opens notice-and-comment rulemaking on the proposed $103,265 fee, which would start a public comment period typically lasting 30 to 60 days before any new rule could take effect. Continued litigation is also likely regardless of that process, given the stakes for both the administration’s immigration agenda and the tech and consulting firms that rely heavily on the H-1B program.

What readers are asking

Is the $100,000 H-1B fee still in effect?
No. The fee is currently blocked following Judge Gilliam’s September 30, 2026 ruling, which found the policy unlawful.

Why did the judge strike down the fee?
The court found the fee amounted to a substantive “legislative rule” that required formal notice-and-comment rulemaking, which the administration did not conduct before imposing it.

Is this the first court to block the fee?
No. A Massachusetts federal judge issued a similar nationwide ruling against the fee in June 2026.

Could a new H-1B fee be introduced?
Yes. A proposed $103,265 fee announced by DHS in August 2026 remains under review and could move forward if the administration completes proper rulemaking.

What does “arbitrary and capricious” mean in this context?
It is a legal standard under the Administrative Procedure Act meaning the agency failed to reasonably justify its decision, including by not considering alternatives or the interests of affected parties.

Who is affected by this ruling?
Employers filing new H-1B petitions and the foreign workers those petitions cover are directly affected, as the ruling removes the $100,000 charge for now.

More on US visa policy

For more on US visa fee changes, see our coverage of the USCIS fee increases for asylum, parole, and TPS applicants and the new $750 expedited visa interview fee pilot. We also previously reported on the public charge rule change affecting green card applicants.

Sources

Canada Will Now Tell You Exactly How Long Your Work Permit Wait Is

If you are waiting on a Canadian work permit extension, there is good news. You can now see roughly how much longer that wait will last. Canada work permit processing estimates became personalized in late September 2026. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada quietly updated its processing times webpage. Instead of a single generic estimate for everyone, applicants now see a wait time tailored to their own submission date.

How the new Canada work permit processing tool works

The update lives on the same processing times page IRCC has run for years, but the mechanics changed. Applicants select “Temporary residence” as their application type. Then they choose “Work permit extension in Canada” from a dropdown menu. From there, the tool shows three things. It shows the estimated remaining wait in weeks, personalized to the applicant’s own submission date. It shows how many applicants are ahead of them in the queue. It shows the total number of people currently awaiting a decision.

People who have not yet applied can still use the tool. It will show them what their wait would look like if they submitted today. As of September 26, 2026, the page listed 202,900 applicants awaiting decisions in this category. That gives a sense of just how large the queue actually is.

Who the new estimates cover

The personalized estimates apply to three groups. In-Canada work permit holders extending an existing permit qualify. International student graduates submitting their first Post-Graduation Work Permit application qualify too. So do work permit holders who are changing the conditions attached to their existing permit.

A desk with forms reflecting Canada work permit processing updates

One group is notably excluded. First-time work permit applicants applying from outside Canada do not get a personalized estimate. They still use the original “Work permit in Canada” option, which shows standard, non-personalized processing time estimates. IRCC has not explained why that group was left out of this round of updates. It may simply reflect which application streams were technically easiest to convert first.

Why this matters for applicants

A generic processing time estimate tells an applicant almost nothing useful. It averages everyone together, regardless of when they applied or how the queue has moved since. A personalized estimate is different. It tells someone whether their application is near the front of the line, or still has months to go. That is based on real queue position, not a rough average.

That distinction matters most for people making real decisions around their status. Someone whose work authorization is about to expire needs a clear answer. Is a renewal decision weeks away, or months away? An average figure that might not apply to their case is not good enough. Employers sponsoring workers face the same planning problem, and a more accurate estimate helps them plan staffing with more confidence.

Part of a wider shift at IRCC

This is not IRCC’s first move toward personalized processing estimates. The department first launched personalized processing times for citizenship and permanent residence applications back in October 2025. Extending the same approach to work permit extensions and PGWP applications a year later suggests IRCC sees real value in the tool. It may plan to expand it further to other categories over time.

The timing also lands amid broader scrutiny of Canada’s immigration processing capacity. Previous reporting this year has tracked both increases and decreases in wait times across different application streams. IRCC keeps adjusting staffing and policy in response to application volume. A personalized tool does not by itself reduce the underlying backlog. But it gives applicants a clearer, more honest picture of where they actually stand.

What IRCC watchers should track

Watch for whether IRCC extends personalized estimates to first-time applications from outside Canada. That remains the one major gap in the current rollout. Also watch the overall queue size. The 202,900 figure recorded in late September is worth tracking in the months ahead. It offers a running signal of whether Canada’s work permit backlog is growing or shrinking under current policy.

Frequently asked

What changed with Canada work permit processing estimates?
IRCC updated its processing times webpage in late September 2026. It now shows personalized wait estimates based on an applicant’s own submission date, instead of one generic figure for everyone.

How do I see my personalized estimate?
Select “Temporary residence” as the application type on IRCC’s processing times page. Then choose “Work permit extension in Canada” from the dropdown.

Who qualifies for a personalized estimate?
Three groups qualify: in-Canada work permit holders extending their permit, international student graduates applying for their first PGWP, and work permit holders changing their permit conditions.

Who is excluded from the personalized tool?
First-time work permit applicants applying from outside Canada do not qualify. They still see standard, non-personalized estimates under the original “Work permit in Canada” option.

How many people are currently in the queue?
As of September 26, 2026, IRCC listed 202,900 applicants awaiting decisions in the categories covered by the new tool.

Has IRCC done this before for other application types?
Yes. IRCC launched personalized processing times for citizenship and permanent residence applications back in October 2025. That came a full year before this work permit update.

Reporting sources

  • CIC News — Canada launches personalized processing times for work permit extensions and PGWPs. cicnews.com
  • Government of Canada — Check processing times. canada.ca

For more on Canada’s immigration system, see our coverage of Canada’s broader processing times update. We also covered a recent Canada work permit refusal case.

Canada Must Warn You Before Refusing a Work Permit Over a Job Offer

A Canada work permit refusal over a doubtful job offer now needs a warning first. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) updated its instructions on 17 September 2026 so that officers must send a procedural fairness letter before refusing an employer-specific work permit on genuineness grounds, according to CIC News.

Inside this guide

What changed for a Canada work permit refusal

IRCC’s updated bulletin, “Assessing the genuineness of the offer of employment on a work permit application”, ends the practice of summary refusals where officers doubt a job offer. Officers must now issue a procedural fairness letter, or PFL, and place the file on hold while they wait for an answer. The letter must set out the specific concerns about the genuineness of the offer.

You can read the rules in the official IRCC bulletin.

How long employers have to respond

CIC News reports that employers get 15 days, or the applicable office standard, to answer with documents. A 30-day review window then follows the employer’s deadline, during which officers assess the response.

Employment contracts are optional but officers may review them if submitted. In practice, strong evidence of a real business, real duties and real pay is the best defence.

Canada work permit refusal - Toronto skyline at sunset

Who the new Canada work permit rules cover

The change applies to all employer-specific work permit applicants. That includes workers under the International Mobility Program, whose permits are exempt from a labour market impact assessment, and applicants under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program. Employers who sponsor foreign workers are affected too.

To illustrate, imagine a Filipino care worker applying for a live-in caregiver role. The update exempts live-in caregivers from the “active engagement in business” requirement. That is an example of how the rules apply, not a real case.

The bulletin also removes physical location requirements for Canadian worksites, so home-based businesses can qualify. It clarifies that shell businesses used to bring foreign nationals into the country do not count as operating businesses.

What applicants should do next

Prepare your paperwork before you apply. Make sure the employer can show real operations, payroll records and a clear job description. If a PFL arrives, answer within the deadline and address each concern directly.

For wider context on timing, read our updates on Canada processing times and the latest Express Entry draw. You can also check your options with our visa eligibility checker.

Your Canada work permit questions answered

When did the Canada work permit instructions change?

IRCC published the updated instructions on 17 September 2026, according to CIC News.

What is a procedural fairness letter?

It is a letter in which an officer sets out specific concerns about your application and gives you a chance to respond before a decision.

How long do employers have to respond?

15 days, or the applicable office standard, followed by a 30-day review window.

Are home-based businesses allowed now?

Yes. The update removes physical location requirements and says home-based businesses can qualify.

Do live-in caregivers have to show active engagement in the business?

No. Live-in caregivers are exempt from that requirement under the update.

Sources

Image: Toronto skyline at night by Wladyslaw, Wikimedia Commons, licensed CC BY-SA 3.0. Second image: Toronto skyline at sunset by Jchmrt, Wikimedia Commons, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.